2006
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A work function study of ultrathin alumina formation on Cu‐9%Al(111) surface

Abstract: We studied work function changes during oxidation of Cu-9%Al(111) surfaces at 900 and 670 K as a function of oxygen exposure in situ using ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy and Kelvin probe. The results showed that work function first decreased by 0.51 eV after 256 L O 2 exposure at 900 K, and then remained unchanged upon further oxygen uptake. The formation of the interfacial dipole layer was the main factor that determined work function and XPS binding energy shifts of Al 2 O 3 energy levels at 900 K. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WF of ultra-thin Al 2 O 3 over-layers decreased with subsequent 2-10-cycle ALD deposition and shifted to 4.4 eV after the 10-cycle ALD deposition process. A similar trend was found in [27], where the interfacial dipole layers were regarded as the main factor that determined the 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The WF of ultra-thin Al 2 O 3 over-layers decreased with subsequent 2-10-cycle ALD deposition and shifted to 4.4 eV after the 10-cycle ALD deposition process. A similar trend was found in [27], where the interfacial dipole layers were regarded as the main factor that determined the 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While it is reported for an Si/SiO 2 system with very thin oxide layers that the peak position of an Si core level line shifts 0.4 eV or more due to image charges, [15] thin-layer effects reported in other systems like Al/Al 2 O 3 are much smaller (0.1-0.2 eV). [16] If such a small shift were present, it would be within the experimental error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…), formation of the Fermi edge allowed us to calculate the WF. We use the following relation: WF = hν − ( E cut‐off − E F ), where E F is the Fermi energy . After heating at 500 °C the WF of the system was 5 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%