A workflow to facilitate three-dimensional geometrical modelling of complex poly-deformed geological units

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThe three-dimensional (3D) geometry of complexly deformed regions is often beyond the scope of simple 2D and 2.5D representation in cross-sections and block diagrams. Methods must be developed for fully three-dimensional representation. A workflow for such three-dimensional modelling of structurally complex areas is presented. Data requirements are tailored to typical results of structural field work in strongly deformed rocks from mid-crustal levels. The workflow is based on data evaluation and data export using standard geographical information system and database management systems. Three-dimensional modelling in polyphase deformed areas is highly dependent on the correct interpretation of variations in the orientation of the dominant planar fabrics. The computer-aided earth-modelling software 3D GeoModeller is well adapted for managing this problem. It calculates the geometry of geological interfaces taking into account simultaneously the foliation data and location of lithological contacts. The workflow is based on iterative model refinement based on interactive editing of the geometry in section and map views with data assessment and pre-processing using GIS software. This approach assures internal consistency of the resulting three-dimensional models. Modelling of the Lower Lepontine Nappes in the Central Alps is used as an illustrative example from a complexly deformed terrain.

Three-Dimensional Modelling of Geological Surfaces Using Generalized Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions

“…(4) Many geological implicit surface modelling methods allow the user to incorporate structural anisotropy, the spa- Fig. 1 Structural constraint types used for implicit surface modelling in sparse data environments tial characteristic of a geological surface to exhibit a preferred direction of continuity, into the interpolation (Maxelon et al 2009;Massiot and Caumon 2010). However, none of the existing methods model anisotropy by computing orientation matrices (Sect.…”

The development mechanism and control technology visualization of the vault cracks in the ancient underground cavern of Longyou

“…The support member can be built by the actual size through the function of Revit. The 3D geological model and support model can be integrated to form a complete 3D visualization space using different modeling methods to solve the practical problems (Maxelon et al, 2009).…”

Implicit modeling of folds and overprinting deformation

“…3D structural modeling techniques are essentially data-driven processes honoring spatial observations [Jessell et al, 2014]. In most cases, these techniques rely on expert knowledge for overcoming the sparsity and uncertainty of available observations [Maxelon et al, 2009]. Structural geology concepts are generally incorporated in the process through interpretive elements in the form of maps, cross-sections or control points [Caumon et al, 2009].…”

“…Moreover, structural modeling techniques are generally limited to stratigraphic contact location and bedding orientation [Calgagno et al, 2008. Some types of structural data are often ignored [Maxelon et al, 2009, Jessell et al, 2010, 2014, and part of the knowledge collected in the field is actually lost in the process of creating a geological model. A significant challenge is to formalize conceptual information and combine these with all observations.…”