Global reform talk on pedagogy has been converging around student-centred pedagogy (SCP) in recent decades. One of the significant appeals of this pedagogical model is its democratisation potentials. This article seeks to empirically study SCP's role in democratising learning and promoting social democratisation by taking the case of Turkey, a country whose democracy has been defined as being in acute crisis. The data are drawn from interviews with teachers and school management at eight public primary schools in Ankara. The study is mainly concerned with the potential of SCP in promoting democratic learning in classrooms, and understanding how broader social, cultural and political contexts support or impede such democratisation efforts. The paper will explore if adherence to democratic learning is more than rhetoric, particularly when serious limitations to social and political democratisation continue to persist in Turkey under the regime of the AKP.
IntroductionA remarkable convergence has taken place in the pedagogical field since the 1990s, favouring approaches rooted in constructivism, a theory of learning which emphasises the active participation of learners in knowledge-construction processes (AndersonLevitt 2003;Altinyelken 2012). This can be seen as an unusual convergence, since pedagogy, understood as 'both the act of teaching and the ideas, values, knowledge and evidence that shape and justify it' (Alexander 2015, 253) is highly context-dependent. 'Constructivism stresses the socially and culturally situated nature of the learner; their active involvement in the learning process; instructors as facilitators and learning by doing. In other words, learners are active constructors -or with teachers, co-constructors -of knowledge' (Schweisfurth 2011, 22). Student-centred pedagogy (SCP) is one of the approaches rooted in constructivism, and attained global education policy status by the late twentieth century. SCP underscores that knowledge, values and competencies should prioritise self-directed learning and learning to learn, and students should be encouraged to think critically, pose questions and discuss their viewpoints. Hence, it suggests a 're-culturing of the classroom' (Windschitl 2002) and proposes changes to the identity of students and teachers. Students are envisaged as autonomous, independent, responsible, communicative, and critical, fully engaged in co-constructing knowledge; while teachers are depicted as facilitators, mediators and knowledge brokers (Schweisfurth 2013).