2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These processing strategies involve different neural mechanisms (Debaere, Wenderoth, Sunaert, Van Hecke, & Swinnen, 2003;Jueptner et al, 1997), but this often is ignored when interpreting neural activity. It should be noted that even cognitive architectures like ACT-R (Anderson et al, 2004), SOAR (J. E. Laird, Newell, & Rosenbloom, 1987), and EPIC (Meyer & Kieras, 1997; for an overview, see, e.g., Goertzel et al, 2010) attribute serial skill to just one mechanism (namely increasing the rate of selecting responses, e.g., Lebiere & Wallach, 2001), rather than taking into account the ability to switch to other processing strategies, and using different types of representations.…”
Section: The Dual Processor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These processing strategies involve different neural mechanisms (Debaere, Wenderoth, Sunaert, Van Hecke, & Swinnen, 2003;Jueptner et al, 1997), but this often is ignored when interpreting neural activity. It should be noted that even cognitive architectures like ACT-R (Anderson et al, 2004), SOAR (J. E. Laird, Newell, & Rosenbloom, 1987), and EPIC (Meyer & Kieras, 1997; for an overview, see, e.g., Goertzel et al, 2010) attribute serial skill to just one mechanism (namely increasing the rate of selecting responses, e.g., Lebiere & Wallach, 2001), rather than taking into account the ability to switch to other processing strategies, and using different types of representations.…”
Section: The Dual Processor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the availability of increasingly powerful computers has enabled computational modeling of both cognitive and neural processes (Anderson, 1983;Anderson, Bothell, Byrne, Douglass, Lebiere, & Qin, 2004;De Garis, Shuo, Goertzel, & Ruiting, 2010;Goertzel, Lian, Arel, de Garis, & Chen, 2010;Kandel, Markram, Matthews, Yuste, & Koch, 2013;J. E. Laird, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts to build artificial brains 1 employ both approaches [6,7]. Largescale brain simulations attempt to model in a realistic fashion the details of the brain organisation, i.e.…”
Section: Top-down and Bottom-up Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the survey [6,7] it was concluded that the two approaches display very different strengths. While bottom-up brain simulations are confined to syntactic aspects like how collections of neurons synchronize their electrical discharges, they do not tell anything about semantics, i.e.…”
Section: Top-down and Bottom-up Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application of a neuroscience model to a practical task would be significant in that it would help us understand if computational principles of low level sensorimotor brain structures can be utilized. The development and application of practical subcortical models is also significant for large-scale cortical models [33,34] as they will allow us to explore how such models behave when faced with real-world stimuli, aiding the analysis of causal flow, such as in Darwin X [35], and perhaps providing the hybrid architecture needed for us to bridge the gap between large-scale brain simulations [36] and cognitive architectures [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%