2021
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A worthy conservation target? Revising the status of the rarest bumblebee of Europe

Abstract: Against the context of global wildlife declines, targeted mitigation strategies have become critical to preserve what remains of biodiversity. However, the effective development of conservation tools in order to counteract these changes relies on unambiguous taxonomic determination and delineation. In this study, we focus on an endemic bumblebee species recorded only from the highest altitudes of the Sierra Nevada (Spain), Bombus reinigiellus (Rasmont, 1983). The species has the smallest range of any European … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subject of whether or not subspecies should be considered valuable biological units in conservation biology, and how, has been discussed extensively over the years (Braby et al, 2012; Haig et al, 2006; Patten, 2015; Phillimore & Owens, 2006). For invertebrates in particular, it has been suggested how subspecies represented by isolated allopatric populations, with a distinct phenotype which is correlated with an evolutionary independence should be evaluated as significant biodiversity units for conservation (Braby et al, 2012; Ghisbain et al, 2021). The global standards for the identification of KBAs allow the detection of KBAs for subspecies solely through an assessment of their distinct genetic diversity (IUCN, 2016; KBA Standards and Appeals Committee of IUCN SSC/WCPA, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of whether or not subspecies should be considered valuable biological units in conservation biology, and how, has been discussed extensively over the years (Braby et al, 2012; Haig et al, 2006; Patten, 2015; Phillimore & Owens, 2006). For invertebrates in particular, it has been suggested how subspecies represented by isolated allopatric populations, with a distinct phenotype which is correlated with an evolutionary independence should be evaluated as significant biodiversity units for conservation (Braby et al, 2012; Ghisbain et al, 2021). The global standards for the identification of KBAs allow the detection of KBAs for subspecies solely through an assessment of their distinct genetic diversity (IUCN, 2016; KBA Standards and Appeals Committee of IUCN SSC/WCPA, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental taxonomic research remains the basis for all subsequent work, from monitoring to species conservation (Ghisbain, Martinet, et al, 2021; Ghisbain, Rosa et al, 2023). Considering the great diversity of insects (including pollinators), more taxonomic work is needed together with the development of taxonomic tools for the relevant groups, both crucial to the understanding of ecology, biogeography and conservation status (Hochkirch et al, 2021; Nieto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the case of B. konradini, Martinet et al 2018; and other cases recently presented by the author in his works Williams et al 2020;Williams 2021). As this scenario is relatively common in bumblebees (many species indeed show a high degree of crypticism: Ghisbain et al 2020Ghisbain et al , 2021Williams 2021), properly naming entities with different phenotypic aspects can be helpful for future research. Finally, because subspecies can be recognized as valid taxonomic entities that can receive conservation measures following the IUCN standards, presenting them in identification guides could be useful to allow their monitoring at local scales.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 90%