2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21010258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wrist Sensor Sleep Posture Monitoring System: An Automatic Labeling Approach

Abstract: In the hospital, a sleep postures monitoring system is usually adopted to transform sensing signals into sleep behaviors. However, a home-care sleep posture monitoring system needs to be user friendly. In this paper, we present iSleePost—a user-friendly home-care intelligent sleep posture monitoring system. We address the labor-intensive labeling issue of traditional machine learning approaches in the training phase. Our proposed mobile health (mHealth) system leverages the communications and computation capab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ET classifier obtains the highest mean F1score when the sensor is placed on the right thigh (i.e., 97.3%) and right wrist (i.e., 78.6%) locations, while AdaLSTM achieves the highest F1-Score values for the chest (i.e., 95.3%) and the right wrist(i.e., 74.2%) among all the algorithms. The linear classifiers such as LDA [7] and SVM [22] achieve higher F1-Score (i.e ranged 90.4%-97.2%) than the proposed models when applied to data collected from the sensor on the thighs and the chest. The linear relationship between the lying posture and accelerometer readings causes the superiority of state-of-the-art for these locations.…”
Section: Integrated Datasetmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ET classifier obtains the highest mean F1score when the sensor is placed on the right thigh (i.e., 97.3%) and right wrist (i.e., 78.6%) locations, while AdaLSTM achieves the highest F1-Score values for the chest (i.e., 95.3%) and the right wrist(i.e., 74.2%) among all the algorithms. The linear classifiers such as LDA [7] and SVM [22] achieve higher F1-Score (i.e ranged 90.4%-97.2%) than the proposed models when applied to data collected from the sensor on the thighs and the chest. The linear relationship between the lying posture and accelerometer readings causes the superiority of state-of-the-art for these locations.…”
Section: Integrated Datasetmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, Jeng et. al [22] proposed a sleep position detection algorithm that achieved 90% accuracy in detecting postures supine, prone and laterals using the data collected from an accelerometer sensor on the wrist of the users. Their proposed model applied a support vector machine classifier with a linear kernel and a random forest of 100 trees on the mean value of the signal.…”
Section: Single-sensor Lying Posture Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forest Algorithm: This is a supervised learning algorithm; it is a combination of multiple Decision Trees; this ensemble algorithm works for classification and regression problems [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second level, SVM and RF algorithms are used to further classify SPC into eight and NonSPC into four motions. iSleePost [33] is another non-invasive system which uses inertial sensors attached to the wrist and chest positions of the users. The chest-attached sensor is only used in the training phase and is no longer needed after the model is trained.…”
Section: Wearable-based Approaches For Posture Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, machine learning requires more resources which is a problem for wearable devices given their small sizes and battery requirements. Some solutions have tried to tackle this problem by shifting the training phase offline [33] while other have used light weight techniques to ease the burden on the wearable devices.…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%