It is thought that laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR) for lower rectal cancer improves quality of life (QOL) of these patients. However, it is a highly demanding surgical procedure. Despite an increasing surgical experience in high-volume hospitals, anastomotic leakage still remains a challenge [1,2].To reduce this leak rate, Fujii and colleagues [3] have developed and propose in the February issue of Surgical Endoscopy a new technique. The authors have tested the safety and efficiency of this method in 28 patients with low-lying rectal cancer and compared the results with those of 107 patients with similar tumor location treated by using multiple stapling for rectal transaction.Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been standard in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. For the vast majority of patients, a sphincter-preserving treatment strategy is a primary desire. As a result of intensive research, low anterior resection (LAR) has been developed, and many patients benefit from this surgical approach. However, in many cases, decision-making between LAR and total rectal excision is currently too hard. Criteria for surgical decisions have not been standardized, and there is debate among surgeons about which is the optimal surgery for patients with low-lying rectal cancer. Standardized surgical quality is fundamental for improving outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal cancer [4][5][6], and the oncological principles of open surgery regarding R0 resection should also be met in laparoscopic surgery [7,8].Laparoscopic rectal resection has not been included in guidelines, even though evidence for the superiority of laparoscopic over open colectomy for colon cancer, and positive results from retrospective studies and small randomized controlled trials [9] suggest the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic approach. Moreover, a better view of the pelvis allows precision in performing safer and more effective TME by LLAR rather than by open surgery [1, 2]. There are expectations that not only will the underway randomized controlled trials provide positive results in favor of LLAR but also that the precision of laparoscopic or robotic surgery in TME may also improve local control and overall survival [10,11].Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic TME (LTME), with a rate of approximately 10% despite rapid advances, still remains a substantial problem [1,2]. Risk factors related to anastomotic failure have been reported to be TME and multiple anastomotic stapling, which may decrease blood supply to the remaining rectum stump and increase the risk of colorectal anastomosis leakage [1]. To reduce the clinical consequences of this anastomosis failure a protective temporal ileostoma is used, but there is still debate on its clinical utility [12].Fujii and colleagues [3] looked at whether their technique, called the Y-Hood method, was safe and more effective in reducing anastomotic leak as compared with the double-stapling technique. The authors developed clamp forceps for intestinal lavage and a Y-shaped vinyl hood th...