2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2017.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AARBAC: Attribute-Based Administration of Role-Based Access Control

Abstract: Administrative Role Based Access Control (ARBAC) models deal with how to manage user-role assignments (URA), permission-role assignments (PRA), and rolerole assignments (RRA). A wide-variety of approaches have been proposed in the literature for URA, PRA and RRA. In this paper, we propose attribute-based administrative models that unify many prior approaches for URA and PRA. The motivating factor is that attributes of various RBAC entities such as admin users, regular users and permissions can be used to admin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A role based administrative model is presented in Rajkumar and Sandhu (2016) to administer RBAC components and monitor administrative permissions. An attribute based administration model is presented in Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017a) and Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017b) to manage URA and PRA components of RBAC. Finally, an attribute based administration model for managing RRA component of RBAC is presented in Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017c).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A role based administrative model is presented in Rajkumar and Sandhu (2016) to administer RBAC components and monitor administrative permissions. An attribute based administration model is presented in Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017a) and Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017b) to manage URA and PRA components of RBAC. Finally, an attribute based administration model for managing RRA component of RBAC is presented in Ninglekhu and Krishnan (2017c).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%