2020
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Phase 4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Retrospective designs are considered inferior to prospective studies for numerous reasons. First of all, the quality of the data depends highly on the quality and accuracy of the documentation ( 74 ). This can be especially problematic for variables that lack a clear definition, e.g., “negative attitude toward staff”, which may be interpreted differently when assessed by different clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective designs are considered inferior to prospective studies for numerous reasons. First of all, the quality of the data depends highly on the quality and accuracy of the documentation ( 74 ). This can be especially problematic for variables that lack a clear definition, e.g., “negative attitude toward staff”, which may be interpreted differently when assessed by different clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital and automated methods used in this study improved data accuracy and standardised the data collection process. It is also difficult to control for bias and confounders in retrospective studies (Hess, 2004). The novel approach to data collection used in this study provided access to a wide range of demographic and clinical confounders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One long-standing example of pursuing ideal respiratory care is the assembly and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines that are based on the best available evidence and that also help to identify gaps in knowledge to frame key questions for further study. 6 Another example has been the development of respiratory care or RT-driven protocols, [7][8][9][10][11] pioneered by Judy Tietsort and George Burton in the 1990s 7 and then refined and studied by several other groups, [9][10][11] including in 2 randomized controlled trials 9,10 that concordantly support the efficacy of respiratory care protocols in enhancing the allocation of care with an associated lower cost of care (Table 1).…”
Section: In Search Of the Holy Grail Of Respiratory Carementioning
confidence: 99%