2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculation of neutral and singly charged Mgn (n⩽11) clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the Jellium model has been most successful for explaning the magic number of the simple alkali metal clusters, even for confirming the magic number of the noble metal Au n clusters. For Mg n clusters, the ab initio calculations indicate the magic number N = 4, 10, and 20 for small sized clusters 30,[39][40][41] , which is in agreement with simple Jellium model. However, the finding of new experiment reveals the most intensive peaks in the mass spectra at N = 5, 10, 15, 18, and 20 31 .…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the Jellium model has been most successful for explaning the magic number of the simple alkali metal clusters, even for confirming the magic number of the noble metal Au n clusters. For Mg n clusters, the ab initio calculations indicate the magic number N = 4, 10, and 20 for small sized clusters 30,[39][40][41] , which is in agreement with simple Jellium model. However, the finding of new experiment reveals the most intensive peaks in the mass spectra at N = 5, 10, 15, 18, and 20 31 .…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…1. Note that the isomers of Mg n reported by earlier works 29,30,[36][37][38][39][40][41] are reproduced by utilizing CALYPSO structural searching method. The most stable structures of the Mg n clusters obtained in our searches are consistent with previous results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The initial cluster geometries were manually constructed based on structures found in the literature. 67,68 All of the CC calculations reported in this work employed restricted Hartree−Fock reference functions for singlets and restricted open-shell Hartree−Fock reference functions for doublets. We used aug-cc-pVnZ and aug-cc-pCVnZ (n = T, Q) correlation-consistent basis sets, 139 where the calculations with pVnZ basis sets correlated only valence electrons and the calculations with the pCVnZ basis sets, which include additional core−valence (CV) polarization functions, correlated all electrons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical investigations of magnesium clusters reported to date involve numerous Kohn–Sham density functional theory (DFT) calculations exploiting various exchange-correlation (XC) functionals ,,,,− and several ab initio wave function computations using Hartree–Fock theory, Møller–Plesset (MP) perturbation theory, including the second-order MP2 and fourth-order MP4 treatments, ,, complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) approach, , the coupled-cluster (CC) method , using a popular quasiperturbative CCSD­(T) , approximation, ,,,,, and the multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) method . A van der Waals potential for Mg 2 , in which damped dispersion contributions based on C 6 , C 8 , and C 10 coefficients were added to a repulsive potential based on Hartree–Fock calculations, has been reported as well …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may expect Be n clusters and other alkaline‐earth clusters as well to form stable anions in their ground states. As was shown in calculations of Be n and Mg n anion clusters at different levels of theory 6–16, it is really the case, see also the experimental measurements of the photoelectron spectra of Mg n by Bowen et al 17.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%