2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1499578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio Calculations for SrTiO3 (100) Surface Structure

Abstract: Abstract. Results of detailed calculations for SrTiOs (100) surface relaxation and the electronic structure for the two different terminations (SrO and TiO2) are discussed. These are based on ab initio Hartree-Fock (HF) method with electron correlation corrections and Density Functional Theory (DFT) with different exchange-correlation functionals, including hybrid (B3PW, B3LYP) exchange techniques. Results are compared with previous ab initio plane wave LDA calculations. All methods agree well on both surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note that there are other potential mechanisms for compensating the macroscopic dipole, such as redistributing the charges on the existing ions and charge transfer effects that cannot be captured with the present methodology. In particular, a considerable increase of near-surface covalency was shown in DFT calculations of SrTiO 3 (100) surface and polar (110) surface. , However, in other cases, such filling of electronic states at the surface tend to be unfavorable, suggesting that the approach used here is energetically competitive with other approaches…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, we note that there are other potential mechanisms for compensating the macroscopic dipole, such as redistributing the charges on the existing ions and charge transfer effects that cannot be captured with the present methodology. In particular, a considerable increase of near-surface covalency was shown in DFT calculations of SrTiO 3 (100) surface and polar (110) surface. , However, in other cases, such filling of electronic states at the surface tend to be unfavorable, suggesting that the approach used here is energetically competitive with other approaches…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Surface energy is a measure of the energy necessary for the destruction of chemical bonds between atoms when creating a crystal surface. It can also be thought of as the extra energy of the surface relative to the crystal interior . It can therefore be calculated using Equation : 0.25emγsurf=12S()EsurfEbulk, where S is the area of the AlN surface, γ surf is the interfacial energy, and E surf and E bulk are the free energies of the surface model and that of the bulk model, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no matter which plane was exposed, the lowest energy principle would be followed. Take the STO as an example, It can be deduced from the literature that the {100}, {110}, and {111} planes had surface energy close to each other, which implied that each of them may be exposed according to the preferred orientation of the film. This accounted for the STO films with the (110) and (100) preferred orientations exposed different facets of {110}, {111}, and {100}.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%