1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.10561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculations of structural and electronic properties of 6H-SiC(0001) surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
78
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
20
78
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results are obtained for sample voltages with magnitudes in the range 0.8-2.0 V. This combination of tunneling spectra and surface topography is clearly consistent with what is expected for a T 4 Si adatom model. Furthermore, it is inconsistent with other models of the surface which involve vacancies [27], trimers [25,29] or more complicated entities since there, we would expect either metallic bands or the empty and filled states at different spatial locations or both. Our results are unable to distinguish between Si and C adatoms, T 4 and H 3 adatoms, or discern rearrangements of the bulk layers beneath the adatoms, but nevertheless are strongly in favor of a MottHubbard model since the empty and filled states are spatially coincident.…”
Section: Mott-hubbard Gap Of Sic(0001)√3×√3 Surfacementioning
confidence: 39%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results are obtained for sample voltages with magnitudes in the range 0.8-2.0 V. This combination of tunneling spectra and surface topography is clearly consistent with what is expected for a T 4 Si adatom model. Furthermore, it is inconsistent with other models of the surface which involve vacancies [27], trimers [25,29] or more complicated entities since there, we would expect either metallic bands or the empty and filled states at different spatial locations or both. Our results are unable to distinguish between Si and C adatoms, T 4 and H 3 adatoms, or discern rearrangements of the bulk layers beneath the adatoms, but nevertheless are strongly in favor of a MottHubbard model since the empty and filled states are spatially coincident.…”
Section: Mott-hubbard Gap Of Sic(0001)√3×√3 Surfacementioning
confidence: 39%
“…The states at about 1 eV above and below the Fermi level we identify with those seen in PES and IPES. The origin of the state observed at 1.9 eV above E F is not clear at present, although it may be associated with one of the many surface resonances which occur on this surface [29]. For p-type material, at large currents we again see a mostly featureless spectrum with a strong feature D 2 at large positive voltages.…”
Section: Mott-hubbard Gap Of Sic(0001)√3×√3 Surfacementioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This relaxation is caused by bond-bending angular forces at the second-layer atoms, which affect C atoms stronger than Si atoms. The larger displacement of surface atoms on the C-face gives energy gain of 0.30 eV and on the Si-face the displacement is smaller and the energy gain is only 0.09 eV [11]. As a result the surface free energy of the C-face 6H-SiC is 718 erg/cm 2 and of the Siface is 1767 erg/cm 2 [12].…”
Section: Growth Of Cubic Sicmentioning
confidence: 72%