2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.10.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculations of the electronic structure and specific optical features of β-LiNH4SO4 single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ). Additional support to the energy positions found in this work for structures A (A′) and B (B′), and the corresponding site assignments, is provided by previous X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results on N 1 s core-level binding energies for different compounds bearing NH 399.5 ± 0.2 eV 14 , 400.4±0.1 eV 15 , 400.49±0.08 eV 16 and NO 404.2 eV 17 , 403.9 eV 17 , 403.7 eV 18 , 403.6 19 groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…2 ). Additional support to the energy positions found in this work for structures A (A′) and B (B′), and the corresponding site assignments, is provided by previous X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results on N 1 s core-level binding energies for different compounds bearing NH 399.5 ± 0.2 eV 14 , 400.4±0.1 eV 15 , 400.49±0.08 eV 16 and NO 404.2 eV 17 , 403.9 eV 17 , 403.7 eV 18 , 403.6 19 groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The user can plot any combination of the five described properties on the same figure for convenience, as well as being able to modify all the figures parameters like in any other kind of figure in PyDEF 2.0. A sample is shown on Figure ɛ = ɛ 1 + iɛ 2 the permittivity of the material, where ɛ 1 , ɛ 2 are real components order 2 symmetrical tensors (matrices) and i 2 = −1 n=ɛ1+ɛ12+ɛ222 refractive index k=ɛ1+ɛ12+ɛ222 extinction coefficient R=n12+k2n+12+k2 reflectivity of the material …”
Section: New Features In Pydef 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the optimized crystal structure with the experimental (Table 2), the parameter of relative deviation of the unit cell volume d r and relative root mean squared deviation D r of the distance matrix d ij were used as was done, for example, in refs. [44, 45] The relative deviation of the unit cell volume d r can be found as drbadbreak=Vnormalc(opt)1/3Vnormalc(exp)1/3Vnormalc(exp)1/3,\begin{equation} {d_{\rm{r}}} = \frac{{V{{_{\rm{c}}^{{\rm{(opt)}}}}^{1/3}} - V{{_{\rm{c}}^{(\exp )}}^{1/3}}}}{{V{{_{\rm{c}}^{(\exp )}}^{1/3}}}}, \end{equation}where Vnormalc(opt)$V_{\rm{c}}^{{\rm{(opt)}}}$and Vnormalc(exp)$V_{\rm{c}}^{{\rm{(exp)}}}$are the optimized and experimental unit cell volumes, respectively. The calculated values of the deviation of the cell volume from the experimental are d r = 0.017 for LDA and d r = 0.013 for GGA functionals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%