2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b11900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Extended Hartree–Fock plus Dispersion Method Applied to Dimers with Hundreds of Atoms

Abstract: The Hartree−Fock plus dispersion plus first-order correlation (HFDc (1) ) method consists in augmenting the HF interaction energy by the correlation part of the firstorder interaction energy and the second-order dispersion and exchange-dispersion energies. All of the augmentation terms are computed using the symmetry-adapted perturbation theory based on density functional theory description of monomers [SAPT(DFT)]; thus, HFDc (1) is a fully ab initio method. A partly empirical version of this method, HFD as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table includes comparisons of D as 20 with D as 10 on several other benchmark sets, namely, S66, S66x8, IonHB, UD-ARL, and S12L (with the dimer C7a omitted). All values presented in Table are taken from ref (see ref for computational details) and show that D as 20 gives systematically more accurate dispersion energies than D as 10 , although the improvements are generally not large. The only exception is IonHB, where MURE is 0.7% larger in the case of D as 20 , but MUE is 0.02 kcal·mol –1 smaller.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table includes comparisons of D as 20 with D as 10 on several other benchmark sets, namely, S66, S66x8, IonHB, UD-ARL, and S12L (with the dimer C7a omitted). All values presented in Table are taken from ref (see ref for computational details) and show that D as 20 gives systematically more accurate dispersion energies than D as 10 , although the improvements are generally not large. The only exception is IonHB, where MURE is 0.7% larger in the case of D as 20 , but MUE is 0.02 kcal·mol –1 smaller.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may ask why pDFT+D calculations are needed to improve the rankings, while several comparisons on benchmark interaction energies, see, e.g., refs. 42 , 43 , show that SAPT(DFT) is nearly as accurate as CCSD(T) and more accurate than DFT+D methods. The main reason is that what is used in CSPs are aiFFs, and they include additional uncertainties due to fitting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAPT(DFT) and CCSD(T) calculations scale as and with system size, respectively, where n is the number of electrons, and for dimers with a couple dozens of atoms, SAPT(DFT) calculations are about two orders of magnitude less expensive than CCSD(T) calculations. The recently developed new SAPT(DFT) algorithms and effective computer codes 35 , 42 can be used to compute thousands of grid points for dimers with ~100-atom monomers using reasonable computer resources and being able to achieve this in a few days if a sufficient number of computer cores are available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HF-3c method uses three separate geometry-dependent formulas 38,39 to add energy corrections ("3c") for the various deficiencies of minimal basis set HF: one to account for some of the missing dispersion interactions, and two to mitigate the effects of basis set incompleteness errors. Several other techniques have been proposed in the literature [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] , reflecting the interest in developing computationally inexpensive methods for large systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%