2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio QM/MM Modeling of the Rate-Limiting Proton Transfer Step in the Deamination of Tryptamine by Aromatic Amine Dehydrogenase

Abstract: Aromatic amine dehydrogenase (AADH) and related enzymes are at the heart of debates on the roles of quantum tunneling and protein dynamics in catalysis. The reaction of tryptamine in AADH involves significant quantum tunneling in the rate-limiting proton transfer step, shown by large H/D primary kinetic isotope effects (KIEs), with unusual temperature dependence. We apply correlated ab initio combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods, at levels up to local coupled cluster theory (LCCSD(T)/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98 Note that the barriers here are activation potential energy that cannot be compared directly to a free energy barrier; this would require the calculation of the entropic, tunneling and zero-point energy contributions. 109 The most accurate calculations here, from first principles, are at the LCCSD(T)/(aug)-cc-pVTZ level (barrier height of ~16.3 kcal mol -1 ), which is also in good agreement with experiment (from a rough estimate of these additional contributions) and we use it as a reference for the comparisons. The average barriers from LMP2/(aug)cc-pVTZ and SCS-LMP2/(aug)cc-pVTZ are close (within 1.5 kcal mol -1 ) to the LCCSD(T)/(aug)-cc-pVTZ/ff14SB results.…”
Section: Conformational Sampling and Ab Initio Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…98 Note that the barriers here are activation potential energy that cannot be compared directly to a free energy barrier; this would require the calculation of the entropic, tunneling and zero-point energy contributions. 109 The most accurate calculations here, from first principles, are at the LCCSD(T)/(aug)-cc-pVTZ level (barrier height of ~16.3 kcal mol -1 ), which is also in good agreement with experiment (from a rough estimate of these additional contributions) and we use it as a reference for the comparisons. The average barriers from LMP2/(aug)cc-pVTZ and SCS-LMP2/(aug)cc-pVTZ are close (within 1.5 kcal mol -1 ) to the LCCSD(T)/(aug)-cc-pVTZ/ff14SB results.…”
Section: Conformational Sampling and Ab Initio Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Figure 5 shows results of embedding different WF methods in B3LYP for the model of the reaction in solution, including Information and Modeling 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 compares more favorably than canonical MP2 to CCSD(T). 9,11,13 There is a significant difference in the energies predicted by the CCSD and CCSD(T) methods (~ 6 kcal/mol),…”
Section: Acs Paragon Plus Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Here, a computational study of the carboxylase activity of RuBisCO enzyme assesses different ab initio and DFT electronic structure methods for the reaction path proposed by Gready et al 5 The projector-based embedding approach is used: this can eliminate the variability often found when different DFT exchange-correlation functionals (DFT xcfunctional) are selected. [27][28][29][30] This embedding approach has not previously been applied to a metalloenzyme, to our knowledge. This methodology allows us to obtain accurate activation and reaction energies, by describing the most important part of the reactions with a high-level ab initio post-HF electronic structure method, within a DFT treatment of the active-site model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%