2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio studies of the conformations of ethynyl formate, cyano formate and related ethynyl and cyano compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E − Z energy differences for formic acid esters decrease in the order R‘ = methyl > vinyl > ethynyl. , The hybridization of carbon in the corresponding hydrocarbons R‘H changes from sp 3 to sp 2 to sp in the series, suggesting that the electron-withdrawing abilities of the groups may be important in enhancing the populations of the E -isomers. However, even with very highly electronegative R‘ groups such as trifluoromethyl, the Z conformations of esters are still generally preferred, although by smaller amounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The E − Z energy differences for formic acid esters decrease in the order R‘ = methyl > vinyl > ethynyl. , The hybridization of carbon in the corresponding hydrocarbons R‘H changes from sp 3 to sp 2 to sp in the series, suggesting that the electron-withdrawing abilities of the groups may be important in enhancing the populations of the E -isomers. However, even with very highly electronegative R‘ groups such as trifluoromethyl, the Z conformations of esters are still generally preferred, although by smaller amounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…-(Glyco)sphingolipids and more specifically ceramides (Cers) adopt a parallel orientation of the lipid chains in the cell membrane, requiring a (Z)-configuration of the amide moiety, while the (E)-configuration of amides is preferred in solution and in the solid state by a free-energy difference of ca. 1.2 kcal/mol [1] [2]. There is no a priori reason why the amide moiety of a Cer complexed to a receptor should either adopt the (E)-or the (Z)-configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%