2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab-initio study of elastic anisotropy, hardness and volumetric thermal expansion coefficient of ZnO, ZnS, ZnSe in wurtzite and zinc blende phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous theoretical data provided by Catti and co-workers (Catti et al, 2003) at the Hartree-Fock level of theory resulted in C 11 = 99 GPa, C 12 = 57 GPa and C 44 = 48 GPa at equilibrium geometry, which are in very good agreement with the present ones. Very recent results on the SOECs, calculated at equilibrium with DFT/GGA-PBE approach and basis sets composed of norm conserving pseudopotentials for core electrons and double-zeta polarized orbitals for the valence ones, were reported by Valdez et al (2019). The authors obtained C 11 = 123.7 GPa, C 12 = 62.1 GPa and C 44 = 60 GPa for sphalerite, which are in excellent agreement with the present ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous theoretical data provided by Catti and co-workers (Catti et al, 2003) at the Hartree-Fock level of theory resulted in C 11 = 99 GPa, C 12 = 57 GPa and C 44 = 48 GPa at equilibrium geometry, which are in very good agreement with the present ones. Very recent results on the SOECs, calculated at equilibrium with DFT/GGA-PBE approach and basis sets composed of norm conserving pseudopotentials for core electrons and double-zeta polarized orbitals for the valence ones, were reported by Valdez et al (2019). The authors obtained C 11 = 123.7 GPa, C 12 = 62.1 GPa and C 44 = 60 GPa for sphalerite, which are in excellent agreement with the present ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1.1 [41] 1.4 [42] 1.5 [43] a) Derived from optical transmittance, see Figure S9 Information). The dependence of phase velocity on h/𝜆 extracted by FEM is shown in Figure 3c for both Rayleigh mode and Sezawa modes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure HF is known to highly overestimate the bandgap of solids, but this effect is reduced by the GGA contribution that underestimates the same property. Indeed, recent calculations with pure GGA-PBE approach showed E g values well below 2.5 eV (Karazhanov et al 2006;Sharma et al 2019;Valdez et al 2019), and the addition of the Hubbard correction allowed obtaining results in better agreement with experiments (E g ≈ 3.87 eV). Previous simulations with a semi-ab initio approach known as orthogonalized linear combination of atomic orbitals (OLCAO), based on the Kohn-Sham form of the exchange-correlation potential, resulted in a direct bandgap of about 3.3 eV (Xu and Ching 1993).…”
Section: Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 91%