2010
DOI: 10.1021/jp104764d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio Study of the Electronic Structure of Zinc Oxide and its Ions, ZnO0,±. Ground and Excited States

Abstract: The species ZnO and ZnO(+/-) have been studied by variational multireference and coupled-cluster [RCCSD(T)] methods employing augmented basis sets of quintuple cardinality. Full potential energy curves are reported for 13, 10, and 2 bound states of ZnO, ZnO(+), and ZnO(-), respectively. All our results are in excellent agreement with existing experimental findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
8
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimentally observed vibronic progression gives the distortion in the Zn−O bond length of the excited geometry relative to that of the ground state, Δ r Zn−O =0.02 Å, which was obtained from the equation Δ r Zn−O =SnormalZnormaln-O/4cπμνnormalZnormaln-O , where S Zn−O is the Huang–Rhys parameter, which was determined from the parameter ϵ 0‐ n (see the Supporting Information). The experimentally obtained Δ r Zn−O value of 0.02 Å is consistent with the calculated value Δ r Zn−O =|1.805 Å−1.858 Å|=0.053 Å, and correlates well with the computational results for the [Zn II −O] + molecule …”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The experimentally observed vibronic progression gives the distortion in the Zn−O bond length of the excited geometry relative to that of the ground state, Δ r Zn−O =0.02 Å, which was obtained from the equation Δ r Zn−O =SnormalZnormaln-O/4cπμνnormalZnormaln-O , where S Zn−O is the Huang–Rhys parameter, which was determined from the parameter ϵ 0‐ n (see the Supporting Information). The experimentally obtained Δ r Zn−O value of 0.02 Å is consistent with the calculated value Δ r Zn−O =|1.805 Å−1.858 Å|=0.053 Å, and correlates well with the computational results for the [Zn II −O] + molecule …”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The experimentally obtained Dr ZnÀO value of 0.02 is consistent with the calculated value Dr ZnÀO =j 1.805 À1.858 j= 0.053 ,a nd correlates well with the computational results for the [Zn II À O] + molecule. [12] Although the p-interaction between the metal and oxygen atoms is recognized as the essential interaction for metal-oxo complexes,o wing to the closed-shell structure of Zn II with [Ar](3d) 10 (4s) 0 ,nop-bonds are constructed to oxyl. TheO2p x and O2p y orbitals,w hich are oriented perpendicular to the Zn À Ob ond axis,s carcely overlap with the Zn 3d and 4p orbitals;n evertheless,t hey match in terms of symmetry.…”
Section: Terminaloxooroxyl(radical)complexesoftransitionmetalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other 3d transition-metal/first-row-atom diatomic species have proven to have similar challenges. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These studies illustrate the power of the MRCI approach, which has consistently been shown to be a reasonably robust way of investigating low-lying excited states of these systems to usually at least semi-quantitative accuracy when compared against experiment. However, the studies also demonstrate the limitations of even these very high accuracy methods, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%