2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio theory of complex electronic ground state of superconductors: I. Nonadiabatic modification of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates formation of anti-adiabatic regime with ω H /E F 1.6, or 1.2 depending on particular ω H . According to nonadiabatic theory of electronvibration interactions [10][11][12], whether system can be stabilized in anti-adiabatic state at distorted geometry depends on correction…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It indicates formation of anti-adiabatic regime with ω H /E F 1.6, or 1.2 depending on particular ω H . According to nonadiabatic theory of electronvibration interactions [10][11][12], whether system can be stabilized in anti-adiabatic state at distorted geometry depends on correction…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, not only Eliashberg approximation does not hold, but Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) is broken. Theory of electronvibration interaction beyond the BOA was elaborated in [10] and it has been shown [11][12][13][14][15][16] for different types of low and high-T c superconductors (e.g. A15 structures, cuprates and MgB 2 ) that transition into superconducting state is directly related to EP coupling-induced transition from metal-like adiabatic state into stabilized and geometrically degenerated anti-adiabatic ground state connected with gap(s) opening in single-particle spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51][52][53] The mentioned aspect of band structure instability is important for crossing of the system from adiabatic metal-like state into anti-adiabatic state which, if stabilized, is directly related to superconducting state transition. 42,51,[54][55][56] Study of this problem, i.e. aspects of anti-adiabatic state stabilization and superconducting state transition, is out of the scope of the present paper and it will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Iii2 Band Structure Of Swsintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of this problem is presented in full extension in [25][26][27][28]. In order to make the results of this paper intelligible, we present here the final form of corrections to particular energy terms, which arise as the consequence of non-adiabatic electron-vibration coupling and explicitly accounts for dependence of electronic structure on instantaneous nuclear coordinates (Q) and momenta (P), i.e.…”
Section: Influence Of Nuclear Dynamics On Electronic Structure -Problmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Eliashberg's treatment [15] is based on a strict adiabatic assumption, transition into the anti-adiabatic state not only invalidates application of the strong coupling theory (BCS-like theories in general) [15][16][17], but at the same time it means breakdown of the crucial Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) which has to be valid not only in equilibrium but also over the relevant configuration space including geometry with corresponding vibration displacements. In these circumstances, calculations beyond the BOA are required to allow comparison of theory and experiment in detail [24], such as it enables the anti-adiabatic theory of superconductivity suggested recently [25][26][27]. The latter theory solves the BOA breakdown by introducing an explicit dependence of the electronic structure on nuclear dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%