Abstracts Accepted for Publication 2019
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.5552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab0441 therapy With Tofacitinib in a Colombian Population With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of the Daily Clinical Practice

Abstract: Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the quality of life and reduces life expectancy. It is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies and erosive synovitis that mainly involves small joints (1). Tofacitinib is the first oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved in 2012 for the treatment of patients with active, moderate to severe RA that does not respond to other therapies (2).Objectives:The objective was to describe demographic and clinical results of a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportions of patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy ranged from 16.6-66.1%. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Where data were available, patients in these RWD analyses tended to be older and have lower baseline disease activity compared with patients in the clinical trials (Table 1). Patients had lower tender and swollen joint counts and were less likely to be bDMARD-naïve in the RWD analyses compared with the RCT and LTE studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportions of patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy ranged from 16.6-66.1%. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Where data were available, patients in these RWD analyses tended to be older and have lower baseline disease activity compared with patients in the clinical trials (Table 1). Patients had lower tender and swollen joint counts and were less likely to be bDMARD-naïve in the RWD analyses compared with the RCT and LTE studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%