2022
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AB0627 Evaluation of internal consistency, feasibility, and reliability of the Italian version of ANCA-associated vasculitis patient-reported outcome (AAV-PRO_ita) questionnaire: preliminary results from a multicenter study on a large cohort of Italian patients

Abstract: BackgroundThe ANCA-associated vasculitis patient-reported outcome (AAV-PRO) questionnaire is a 29-item disease-specific PRO measure for AAV[1]. The Italian version of the AAV-PRO questionnaire (AAV-PRO_ita) was translated in collaboration with Oxford and Bristol University (UK) and was preliminarily tested on a single-center Italian cohort[2].ObjectivesThe main objective of this multicentric study was to assess the internal consistency, feasibility, and reliability of the AAV-PRO_ita in a large cohort of Itali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings had not been investigated in the previous validation study of the English questionnaire [ 6 ]. Conversely, in the validation study of the English questionnaire [ 6 ] and in the preliminary evaluation of our questionnaire [ 12 ], older participants (≥65 years old) had higher scores in the PF domain ( P < 0.05), and younger participants (<65 years old) showed a trend of higher scores in the SEI domain; however, these data were not confirmed by our final results. The VDI and BVASv3 did not appear to be related to the AAV-PRO_ita scores ( r < 0.3, i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…These findings had not been investigated in the previous validation study of the English questionnaire [ 6 ]. Conversely, in the validation study of the English questionnaire [ 6 ] and in the preliminary evaluation of our questionnaire [ 12 ], older participants (≥65 years old) had higher scores in the PF domain ( P < 0.05), and younger participants (<65 years old) showed a trend of higher scores in the SEI domain; however, these data were not confirmed by our final results. The VDI and BVASv3 did not appear to be related to the AAV-PRO_ita scores ( r < 0.3, i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…This study examined the association between the domains of the AAV-PRO instrument, other outcome measures, and clinical variables in 70 patients with AAV from Mexico. Preliminary studies have validated the AAV-PRO instrument in other populations [ 21 ]. Table 4 summarizes the results of the present study and the validation studies of the AAV-PRO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-four of the 26 male patients (92%) completed the IIEF-5 questionnaire. Overall, the median score was 20 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). According to the cutoff values, 17 (70.8%) of men had some degree of erectile dysfunction (in 12 of them it was mild to moderate and in 5 it was severe).…”
Section: Sexual Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the AAV-PRO can guarantee for the patients that their perspective on the disease is represented in the study on AAV (100, 104). The effort to make AAV-PRO more useful and available in the clinical practice is ongoing: AAV-PRO has been translated in 14 languages and it has been validated in order to be incorporated into clinical trials (97, [105][106][107]. Recently, a preliminary Italian work that translated and evaluated the AAV-PRO questionnaire showed that: a) AAV-PRO scores related with VDI value more than disease duration or activity; b) higher scores belonged to women in all domains, especially in ones concerning social and emotional impact; c) therapy with GC has impact on the physical function domain (105).…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effort to make AAV-PRO more useful and available in the clinical practice is ongoing: AAV-PRO has been translated in 14 languages and it has been validated in order to be incorporated into clinical trials (97, [105][106][107]. Recently, a preliminary Italian work that translated and evaluated the AAV-PRO questionnaire showed that: a) AAV-PRO scores related with VDI value more than disease duration or activity; b) higher scores belonged to women in all domains, especially in ones concerning social and emotional impact; c) therapy with GC has impact on the physical function domain (105). These data are confirmed by a comparative Greek study (108) reporting that in AAV, QoL correlated more strongly with organ damage and less with disease activity, unlike in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, in whom QoL correlated with both disease activity and damage.…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%