1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00795.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abandoning the concept of ‘schizophrenia‘: Some implications of validity arguments for psychological research into psychotic phenomena

Abstract: After more than 90 years of research in which the presence or absence of a diagnosis of schizophrenia has been used as an independent variable, little of certainty has been found out about the aetiology of the hypothesized schizophrenia disease process. One possible reason for this lack of progress is that schizophrenia is not a valid object of scientific inquiry. Data from published research (mainly carried out by distinguished psychiatrists) are reviewed casting doubt on: (i) the reliability, (ii) the constr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given apparent flaws of schizophrenia, both complementary and alternative paradigms, bearing a resemblance to our speculations in the current article, have been debated for a long time (Strauss & Gift, 1977;Bentall et al 1988;Brockington, 1992;Boteva & Lieberman, 2003;Keshavan et al 2011). Despite a series of demands for reconceptualization, these scholarly communications (in particular, strategies for clinical implementation) have been stuck at the theoretical level.…”
Section: The Term 'Schizophrenia'mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Given apparent flaws of schizophrenia, both complementary and alternative paradigms, bearing a resemblance to our speculations in the current article, have been debated for a long time (Strauss & Gift, 1977;Bentall et al 1988;Brockington, 1992;Boteva & Lieberman, 2003;Keshavan et al 2011). Despite a series of demands for reconceptualization, these scholarly communications (in particular, strategies for clinical implementation) have been stuck at the theoretical level.…”
Section: The Term 'Schizophrenia'mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, where we were able to investigate the impact of diagnosis on intervention efficacy we found no significant differences. This is perhaps not surprising given the well-documented difficulties associated with making clear and distinct diagnoses based on symptoms associated with psychosis (Bentall, Jackson, & Pilgrim, 1988;Craddock & Owen, 2005;van Os, 2010); and many services combine psychosis and bipolar disorder when providing treatment provision (Citrome & Yeomans, 2005;Jolley et al, 2015; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009). As a result, we cautiously conclude that the self-help interventions reviewed here are likely to be equally appropriate for the experiences associated with both psychosis and bipolar disorder diagnoses, but accompany this conclusion with a call for more research focusing specifically on the value of self-help interventions for people with bipolar disorder.…”
Section: What Factors Influence the Effectiveness Of Self-help Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradox of an ever increasing volume of research data, and the apparent stalemate of the search for causes of the disorder, has fuelled doubts about the validity of the schizophrenia construct, some leading to proposals to discard the category 7,8 or to replace it with a pre-Kraepelinian notion of a unitary 'psychosis'. 9 Given the protean nature of the symptoms of schizophrenia and the poor coherence of the clinical and biological findings, such doubts are not without reason.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%