2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0420-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ABCA4-associated disease as a model for missing heritability in autosomal recessive disorders: novel noncoding splice, cis-regulatory, structural, and recurrent hypomorphic variants

Abstract: PurposeABCA4-associated disease, a recessive retinal dystrophy, is hallmarked by a large proportion of patients with only one pathogenic ABCA4 variant, suggestive for missing heritability.MethodsBy locus-specific analysis of ABCA4, combined with extensive functional studies, we aimed to unravel the missing alleles in a cohort of 67 patients (p), with one (p = 64) or no (p = 3) identified coding pathogenic variants of ABCA4.ResultsWe identified eight pathogenic (deep-)intronic ABCA4 splice variants, of which fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
173
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, eight recently discovered causal deep‐intronic variants (c.769–784C>T, c.859–506G>C, c.859–540C>G, c.1937+435C>G, c.4539+1100A>G, c.4539+1106C>T, c.4539+2064C>T and c.5197–557G>T) (Bauwens et al, ; Sangermano et al, ) as well as 300 bp upstream and 300 bp downstream sequences were captured using 174 smMIPs (Table S1 and Figure S1). Larger segments were sequenced as they may carry novel causal deep‐intronic variants that may affect the recognition of the same pseudoexons by the splicing machinery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, eight recently discovered causal deep‐intronic variants (c.769–784C>T, c.859–506G>C, c.859–540C>G, c.1937+435C>G, c.4539+1100A>G, c.4539+1106C>T, c.4539+2064C>T and c.5197–557G>T) (Bauwens et al, ; Sangermano et al, ) as well as 300 bp upstream and 300 bp downstream sequences were captured using 174 smMIPs (Table S1 and Figure S1). Larger segments were sequenced as they may carry novel causal deep‐intronic variants that may affect the recognition of the same pseudoexons by the splicing machinery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously reported pathogenic variants with high AFs such as c.2588G>C and c.5603A>T (AFs in non‐Finnish European [nFE] in gnomAD 0.00784 and 0.06647, respectively) (Cornelis et al, ; F. P. Cremers et al, ; Schulz et al, ; Zernant et al, , ), were selected separately. Known deep‐intronic variants were selected based on prior knowledge from literature (Albert et al, ; Bauwens et al, , ; Braun et al, ; Sangermano et al, ; Schulz et al, ; Zernant et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible reasons for these results are as follows: (1) targeted exome sequencing and WES cannot detect gross deletions, gross insertions, or complex rearrangement variants (Broadgate, Yu, Downes, & Halford, 2017), which might have been present in these families; (2) the sequence depth and coverage in this study was insufficient to call all variants accurately; (3) novel STGD-associated genes may have been filtered out during our raw data analysis; (4) deep-intronic variants in ABCA4 that are potentially associated with autosomal recessive STGD could not be captured through targeted exome sequencing and WES (Albert et al, 2018;Bauwens et al, 2015Bauwens et al, , 2019Bax et al, 2015;Braun et al, 2013;Sangermano et al, 2014;Zernant et al, 2014); and (5) diseasecausing variants with high minor allele frequency, which had not been reported previously may have been filtered out, for example, c.5603A > T, p.(Asn1868Ile) (Cremers, Cornelis, Runhart, & Astuti, 2018;Runhart et al, 2018;Zernant et al, 2017). Possible reasons for these results are as follows: (1) targeted exome sequencing and WES cannot detect gross deletions, gross insertions, or complex rearrangement variants (Broadgate, Yu, Downes, & Halford, 2017), which might have been present in these families; (2) the sequence depth and coverage in this study was insufficient to call all variants accurately; (3) novel STGD-associated genes may have been filtered out during our raw data analysis; (4) deep-intronic variants in ABCA4 that are potentially associated with autosomal recessive STGD could not be captured through targeted exome sequencing and WES (Albert et al, 2018;Bauwens et al, 2015Bauwens et al, , 2019Bax et al, 2015;Braun et al, 2013;Sangermano et al, 2014;Zernant et al, 2014); and (5) diseasecausing variants with high minor allele frequency, which had not been reported previously may have been filtered out, for example, c.5603A > T, p.(Asn1868Ile) (Cremers, Cornelis, Runhart, & Astuti, 2018;Runhart et al, 2018;Zernant et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A region encompassing the entire ABCA4 gene (chr1:94337885‐94703604, hg19) was enriched using a custom HaloPlex Target enrichment kit (Agilent Technologies, Belgium), followed by NGS (MiSeq, Illumina, San Diego, California). Data were analyzed as described previously …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%