2020
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal fluid samples (negative for SARS-CoV-2) from a critically unwell patient with respiratory COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, while reports on patients with cirrhosis and SARS-CoV-2 show a high rate of decompensation with ascites [10], viral etiology in this clinical scenario has not been very well described thus far. At the same time, viral RNA was not detected in samples of ascitic fluid from surgical patients according to previous studies [11,12], so it remains a matter demanding further investigation, especially because these reports present a small number of patients requiring emergency operations and no information regarding comorbidities or immune status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, while reports on patients with cirrhosis and SARS-CoV-2 show a high rate of decompensation with ascites [10], viral etiology in this clinical scenario has not been very well described thus far. At the same time, viral RNA was not detected in samples of ascitic fluid from surgical patients according to previous studies [11,12], so it remains a matter demanding further investigation, especially because these reports present a small number of patients requiring emergency operations and no information regarding comorbidities or immune status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At the same time, viral RNA was not detected in samples of ascitic fluid from surgical patients according to previous studies [ 11 , 12 ], so it remains a matter demanding further investigation, especially because these reports present a small number of patients requiring emergency operations and no information regarding comorbidities or immune status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nonetheless, we implemented precautions in order to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during surgery. It is still controversial whether peritoneal fluid of COVID-19 patients contain SARS-CoV-2, as only few studies report analysis of peritoneal fluid with discordant results [ 37 , 38 ]. Similarly, SARS-CoV-2 has never been identified in surgical smoke [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way in the surgical theater is crucial that staff are properly trained and in particular they use appropriate tools and follow recommendations strictly to avoid increasing the risk of contamination. Both laparoscopic or open surgical procedures in fact, may potentially cause aerosolization of the virus and therefore infection of the personnel, probably even in absence of intestinal perforation or ischemia, due to presence of SARS-CoV-2 in peritoneal fluids [32][33][34][35]. The major concern is, however, the potential recurrence of the disease and persistent transmission from treated patients who meet discharge criteria with 2 sequential negative oropharyngeal swab tests collected 24 h apart since the clearance of viral RNA in patient stools is delayed as compared to oropharyngeal swabs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%