1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02235188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal rectovaginopexy

Abstract: Rectovaginopexy provides significant one-year improvement of both constipation and fecal incontinence. The positive effect on constipation did not deteriorate with time, in contrast to the effect on fecal incontinence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, preoperative defecography revealed anterior rectocele in 8 patients, whereas after surgery an actual rectocele was found in 6 patients ( p = 0.5). In contrast, in a prospective study including 20 patients with anterior rectocele, Silvis and co‐workers observed not only smaller rectoceles after rectovaginopexy in 3 patients but also complete anatomical correction in 13 cases [28]. However, as a transabdominal approach does not show any superiority over a transperineal, transvaginal, or endorectal approach concerning rectoceles, it might be associated with higher morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, preoperative defecography revealed anterior rectocele in 8 patients, whereas after surgery an actual rectocele was found in 6 patients ( p = 0.5). In contrast, in a prospective study including 20 patients with anterior rectocele, Silvis and co‐workers observed not only smaller rectoceles after rectovaginopexy in 3 patients but also complete anatomical correction in 13 cases [28]. However, as a transabdominal approach does not show any superiority over a transperineal, transvaginal, or endorectal approach concerning rectoceles, it might be associated with higher morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many abdominal and perineal techniques have been described, differing mainly in the extent of rectal mobilisation, rectal fixation methods, and the inclusion or exclusion of bowel resection [ 15 , 17 20 ]. The potential advantage of abdominal procedures is fixation of the rectum in a more appropriate anatomic location without sacrifice of the compliant rectal reservoir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent a rectovaginopexy, a technique with the objective of avoiding damage to the hypogastric plexus and pelvic autonomic nerves by dissection of the peritoneum only, without mobilization of the dorsolateral side of the rectum and with preservation of the lateral ligaments (Fig. 3 ) [ 15 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%