2016
DOI: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abelhas, drones e outras Coisas no espaço público: fazendo estratégias na cidade

Abstract: In this article we explore some emerging strategizing practices that citizens use for the development of their immediate urban fabric. We make use of our experiences and engagements with two citizen-driven initiatives in Helsinki, the capital of Finland. The first case attempts to rethink uses and actors of public space by creating viable conditions for the emergence of urban gardening in public spaces. The second initiative is engaged in a political discussion of the boundaries of participation, cultural appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photos have also been used to document subtler aspects of the initiatives, beside logistics and rules. In the case of the KUG there is a growing bank of images that document the joys of gardening, the outcomes that can be expected, and even the invisible roles other actors play in the initiative -like for example bees -(see Marttila and Botero 2016). More sophisticated practices related to the use of photos, such as the ones reported in White et al (2014), were not visible in our cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Photos have also been used to document subtler aspects of the initiatives, beside logistics and rules. In the case of the KUG there is a growing bank of images that document the joys of gardening, the outcomes that can be expected, and even the invisible roles other actors play in the initiative -like for example bees -(see Marttila and Botero 2016). More sophisticated practices related to the use of photos, such as the ones reported in White et al (2014), were not visible in our cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Commons can thus be understood as collaborative arrangements for value production processes that are based on participatory principles. The collaborative and participatory nature of commons resonates well with co-design aspirations [20], and in recent years, several co-design researchers have been exploring commons in theory and in practice [20,22,23,24,33,34,35,39,40,41]. In some of these explorations, commons are proposed as a possible new utopia for Participatory Design [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In recent years, the participatory design /co-design 1 community has been increasingly interested in notions of commons and commoning. This interest has arisen from the engagement of codesigners with commons and new commons [28,14], meaning the shared resources which are used in (and in some cases, generated through) collaborative forms of value production, for example, cultural commons [21,22,24], digital commons [40,41], commons-based production, [33] and urban commons [34,23]. Commons represent an alternative way to organize the property of and access to resources beyond the private and public model [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%