Abstract:In this paper we study Abelian and metabelian quotients of braid groups fn oriented surfaces with boundary components. We provide group presentations and we prove rigidity results for these quotients arising from exact sequences related to (generalised) Fadell-Neuwirth fibrations. 2000
“…For part (b), we just give the proof in the case b = 1. The general case may be obtained in a similar manner using the presentation of B 2 (Σ g,b ) given in [8]. As we mentioned above, a presentation of B 2 (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained by deleting relation (8) from the presentation of Theorem 2.2.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general case may be obtained in a similar manner using the presentation of B 2 (Σ g,b ) given in [8]. As we mentioned above, a presentation of B 2 (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained by deleting relation (8) from the presentation of Theorem 2.2. Thus the proof given in Proposition 2.7 for Σ g is also valid in the case of Σ g,b , except that we can no longer conclude that σ 2 1 is of finite order, so the second factor in the direct product decomposition of B 2 (Σ g,1 )/Γ 3 (B 2 (Σ g,1 )) is Z.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Σ g,b be a compact, connected orientable surface of genus g with b ≥ 0 boundary components. A presentation for B n (Σ g,b ) may be found in [8,Proposition 3.1], and in the case b = 1, a presentation for B n (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained from that of B n (Σ g ) given in Theorem 2.2 by deleting relation (8). The case b = 0 was dealt with in Section 2, so we shall assume henceforth that b ≥ 1.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Suppose that n > m ≥ 3 and n = 4. Using the presentation of B m (Σ g,b ) given in [8,Proposition 3.1], the proof of Theorem 1.4 goes through in this case, the only difference being that B n (Σ g,b )/ σ 1 is isomorphic to Z 2g+b−1 . The result then follows by an argument similar to that given in case (3) of the proof of Theorem 1.1(a)(ii) in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define a map θ : B n (T 2 )/Γ 3 (B n (T 2 )) −→ S 8 on the generators of B n (T 2 )/Γ 3 (B n (T 2 )) by: θ(a 1 ) = (1, 3)(2, 4), θ(b 1 ) = (1, 5)(2, 6)(3, 7)(4, 8) and θ(σ) = (1, 2, 3, 4) (5,6,7,8).…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces and Symmetric Groupsmentioning
Generalising previous results on classical braid groups by Artin and Lin, we determine the values of m, n ∈
$\mathbb N$
for which there exists a surjection between the n- and m-string braid groups of an orientable surface without boundary. This result is essentially based on specific properties of their lower central series, and the proof is completely combinatorial. We provide similar but partial results in the case of orientable surfaces with boundary components and of non-orientable surfaces without boundary. We give also several results about the classification of different representations of surface braid groups in symmetric groups.
“…For part (b), we just give the proof in the case b = 1. The general case may be obtained in a similar manner using the presentation of B 2 (Σ g,b ) given in [8]. As we mentioned above, a presentation of B 2 (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained by deleting relation (8) from the presentation of Theorem 2.2.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general case may be obtained in a similar manner using the presentation of B 2 (Σ g,b ) given in [8]. As we mentioned above, a presentation of B 2 (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained by deleting relation (8) from the presentation of Theorem 2.2. Thus the proof given in Proposition 2.7 for Σ g is also valid in the case of Σ g,b , except that we can no longer conclude that σ 2 1 is of finite order, so the second factor in the direct product decomposition of B 2 (Σ g,1 )/Γ 3 (B 2 (Σ g,1 )) is Z.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Σ g,b be a compact, connected orientable surface of genus g with b ≥ 0 boundary components. A presentation for B n (Σ g,b ) may be found in [8,Proposition 3.1], and in the case b = 1, a presentation for B n (Σ g,1 ) may be obtained from that of B n (Σ g ) given in Theorem 2.2 by deleting relation (8). The case b = 0 was dealt with in Section 2, so we shall assume henceforth that b ≥ 1.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Suppose that n > m ≥ 3 and n = 4. Using the presentation of B m (Σ g,b ) given in [8,Proposition 3.1], the proof of Theorem 1.4 goes through in this case, the only difference being that B n (Σ g,b )/ σ 1 is isomorphic to Z 2g+b−1 . The result then follows by an argument similar to that given in case (3) of the proof of Theorem 1.1(a)(ii) in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces With Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define a map θ : B n (T 2 )/Γ 3 (B n (T 2 )) −→ S 8 on the generators of B n (T 2 )/Γ 3 (B n (T 2 )) by: θ(a 1 ) = (1, 3)(2, 4), θ(b 1 ) = (1, 5)(2, 6)(3, 7)(4, 8) and θ(σ) = (1, 2, 3, 4) (5,6,7,8).…”
Section: Surjections Between Braid Groups Of Orientable Surfaces and Symmetric Groupsmentioning
Generalising previous results on classical braid groups by Artin and Lin, we determine the values of m, n ∈
$\mathbb N$
for which there exists a surjection between the n- and m-string braid groups of an orientable surface without boundary. This result is essentially based on specific properties of their lower central series, and the proof is completely combinatorial. We provide similar but partial results in the case of orientable surfaces with boundary components and of non-orientable surfaces without boundary. We give also several results about the classification of different representations of surface braid groups in symmetric groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.