2005
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.26.4.891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant expression of the gastric mucin MUC6 in human pulmonary adenocarcinoma xenografts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large body of evidences indicates that 11p deletion is closely associated with gastric carcinogenesis (Reis et al 2000;Ranzani et al 1993) and therefore we speculate that reduced expression might be attributable to such chromosome loss. The role of altered MUC6 expression in the progression of malignancies remains elusive although several groups have focused on this point (Pinto-de-Sousa et al 2004;Cozzi et al 2005;Hamamoto et al 2005;Ho et al 1995;Reis et al 2000). In this study, the results demonstrated gastric carcinomas with no MUC6 expression to display large tumor size, deep invasion, frequent lymphatic or venous invasion, and high lymph node metastasis, suggesting that down-regulation of MUC6 expression is closely linked to progression and might be considered as a good indicator of pathobiological behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large body of evidences indicates that 11p deletion is closely associated with gastric carcinogenesis (Reis et al 2000;Ranzani et al 1993) and therefore we speculate that reduced expression might be attributable to such chromosome loss. The role of altered MUC6 expression in the progression of malignancies remains elusive although several groups have focused on this point (Pinto-de-Sousa et al 2004;Cozzi et al 2005;Hamamoto et al 2005;Ho et al 1995;Reis et al 2000). In this study, the results demonstrated gastric carcinomas with no MUC6 expression to display large tumor size, deep invasion, frequent lymphatic or venous invasion, and high lymph node metastasis, suggesting that down-regulation of MUC6 expression is closely linked to progression and might be considered as a good indicator of pathobiological behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The N-terminal domain shows 36.2% amino acid identity with the Nterminal domain of MUC2 and a conserved C-terminal proteolytic cleavage site despite the lack of D4, B and C domains (Cozzi et al 2005;Rousseau et al 2004). It has been demonstrated that MUC6 plays an essential role in epithelial cytoprotection against a wide range of substances (Durai et al 2006), generally being expressed in the duodenum, gallbladder, bronchi, endocervix and pancreas (Byrd and Bresalier 2004;Pinto-de-Sousa et al 2004;Cozzi et al 2005;Rousseau et al 2004;Hamamoto et al 2005). MUC6 is also reported to be expressed in mucopeptic cells of the neck zone and in pyloric glands of the antrum (Ho et al 2004), but links between changes in expression during the genesis and progression of gastric carcinomas have hitherto not attracted attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since the characteristic mucin expression pattern for each organ may be maintained during neoplastic transformation, 15, 16 or altered during carcinogenesis 13, examination of mucin expression could be informative for the pathogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma. Indeed Hamamoto et al reported that aberrant expression of MUC6 was related to carcinogenesis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma using a xenograft model 17. It has been reported that carcinoma cells located in the protruding portions of m‐BAC differentiate into gastric‐type surface mucus cells 18, 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA. Real-time quantitative PCR for NRP1, NRP2, VEGF-A and ß-actin mRNA was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations and our previous reports (17)(18)(19). The primers used were as follows: NRP-1 forward AAATGC GAATGGCTGATTCAG, reverse CTCCATCGAAGACTT CCACGTAGT, and probe TCAACCCTCACTTCGATTTG GAGGACA; NRP-2 forward CACCCTCTGAACTTCGTT CATCGACGG, reverse GGATGGCATTCCACATGTTG, and probe TGTGAAAGGTCAGGGAGAGGAT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%