2003
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant interchromosomal exchanges are the predominant cause of the 22q11.2 deletion

Abstract: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletions are found in almost 90% of patients with DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DGS/VCFS). Large, chromosome-specific low copy repeats (LCRs), flanking and within the deletion interval, are presumed to lead to misalignment and aberrant recombination in meiosis resulting in this frequent microdeletion syndrome. We traced the grandparental origin of regions flanking de novo 3 Mb deletions in 20 informative three-generation families. Haplotype reconstruction showed an unexpectedly high n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
121
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
121
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The phenotype is highly variableover 180 associated clinical manifestations already described -and ranges from severe, with life-threatening malformations, to nearly asymptomatic cases. The major clinical features include congenital heart defects (CHDs), palate defects (velopharyngeal insufficiency, cleft palate, etc), mild-to-moderate immunodeficiency (because of thymic aplasia or hypoplasia), hypocalcemia caused by hypoparathyroidism, a distinct gestalt, developmental delay (DD), learning 1 Département de Génétique, CHU de Reims, Reims, France; 2 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France; 3 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France; 4 CHU Bordeaux, Génétique Médicale, Bordeaux, France; 5 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, CHU de Marseille, Marseille, France; 6 CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Inserm UMR957, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes, France; 7 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Pasteur-Cerba, Saint-Ouen l'Aumône, France; 8 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Necker, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; 9 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; 10 Service de Cytogénétique, Biolille, Lille, France; 11 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris, France; 12 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Postnatal, CHU Clemenceau, Caen, France; 13 Service de Cytogénétique et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France; 14 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Robert Debré, Paris, France; 15 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 16 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Tours, Tours, France; 17 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France; 18 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Cylab, La Rochelle, France; 19 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital de Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis de la Réunion, France; disabilities, intellectual disability (ID) and behavioral disturbances. [3][4][5] Renal, ocular and skeletal anomalies have also been observed.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2 The phenotype is highly variableover 180 associated clinical manifestations already described -and ranges from severe, with life-threatening malformations, to nearly asymptomatic cases. The major clinical features include congenital heart defects (CHDs), palate defects (velopharyngeal insufficiency, cleft palate, etc), mild-to-moderate immunodeficiency (because of thymic aplasia or hypoplasia), hypocalcemia caused by hypoparathyroidism, a distinct gestalt, developmental delay (DD), learning 1 Département de Génétique, CHU de Reims, Reims, France; 2 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France; 3 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France; 4 CHU Bordeaux, Génétique Médicale, Bordeaux, France; 5 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, CHU de Marseille, Marseille, France; 6 CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Inserm UMR957, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes, France; 7 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Pasteur-Cerba, Saint-Ouen l'Aumône, France; 8 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Necker, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; 9 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; 10 Service de Cytogénétique, Biolille, Lille, France; 11 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris, France; 12 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Postnatal, CHU Clemenceau, Caen, France; 13 Service de Cytogénétique et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France; 14 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Robert Debré, Paris, France; 15 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 16 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Tours, Tours, France; 17 Service de Cytogénétique, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France; 18 Laboratoire de Cytogénétique Cylab, La Rochelle, France; 19 Service de Cytogénétique, Hôpital de Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis de la Réunion, France; disabilities, intellectual disability (ID) and behavioral disturbances. [3][4][5] Renal, ocular and skeletal anomalies have also been observed.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…9 Approximately 90% of patients have a 3-Mb deletion spanning LCR22-A to LCR22-D, is referred to as the 'typically deleted region' (TDR). [11][12][13] A smaller (1.5 Mb) deletion spanning LCR22-A to LCR22-B is found in 4 to 7% of patients. [11][12][13] Atypical deletions with at least one breakpoint not mediated by an LCR have also been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this has only been demonstrated for a small number of 22q11.2 deletions. Although most individuals with 22q11DS have a similar "common 3 Mb deletion", a minority have other overlapping and non-overlapping 22q11.2 deletions (Amati et al 1999;Saitta et al 2004). In other microdeletion syndromes such as Williams syndrome, some aspects of the phenotype appear related to the length of the deletion (Stock et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 The LCRs involved in CMT1A or DS22 manifest recombination frequency of average levels, suggestive of no DSB or recombination hotspot activity of the LCRs. 19,20 Thus, recurrent GCRs of this type are unlikely to result from non-random DSBs, but from non-random DSB repair through illegitimate NAHR.…”
Section: Non-random Gcr: Mediation Of Deletion and Duplication Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%