2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant Oscillatory Synchrony Is Biased Toward Specific Frequencies and Processing Domains in the Autistic Brain

Abstract: Background Prevailing theories suggest that autism spectrum disorder (ASD) results from impaired brain communication, causing aberrant synchrony among neuronal populations. However, it remains debated whether synchrony abnormalities are among local or long-range circuits, are circuit specific or are generalized, reflect hypersynchrony or reflect hyposynchrony, and are frequency band–specific or are distributed across the frequency spectrum. Methods To help clarify these unresolved questions, we recorded spon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along these lines, we have previously noted an encouraging correspondence between our published resting-state fMRI results and MEG phase locking measures (e.g. Ghuman et al, 2017;see Picci et al, for review of recent MEG studies), thus suggesting that at least some of the altered dynamics we report here were not due to intense sensory stimulation.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Along these lines, we have previously noted an encouraging correspondence between our published resting-state fMRI results and MEG phase locking measures (e.g. Ghuman et al, 2017;see Picci et al, for review of recent MEG studies), thus suggesting that at least some of the altered dynamics we report here were not due to intense sensory stimulation.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a sample of 68 adolescents and young adults (aged 14–31 years), we employed MEG to explore intrinsic properties related to oscillatory developmental within and between cortical networks, with regard to both power and phase. Specifically, within frequency intervals related to interareal neural interactions (1–49 Hz) [40,41], we examined regional and network-level oscillatory power and functional coupling of well-defined brain networks using the phase-locking value (PLV), similar to recent approaches [42]. Unlike correlation or coherence measures, the PLV ignores the amplitude (power) relationship between 2 oscillators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectedness at a cortical location is defined as the average phase locking between that location and every point on the cortex. We averaged the phase locking at each frequency to find what frequency bands showed a connectedness difference between the DBS-on and DBS-off conditions, as well as between those conditions and controls (Ghuman, van den Honert, Huppert, Wallace, & Martin, 2017; Gotts, Ramot, Jasmin, & Martin, 2019; Gotts et al, 2012). A significant difference between DBS-on and DBS-off was seen in the high beta/gamma band region from 26 to 50 Hz as shown in Figure 1A (DBS-on greater than DBS-off, p<0.05, cluster-level correction for multiple frequency comparisons).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%