2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01082-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant Static and Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Cognitive Impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the temporal dynamics of brain network activity differs in the individuals with TBI is a fairly recent discovery, reported in resting state fMRI ( Vergara et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Hou et al, 2019 ; Lu et al, 2021 ), in task-related fMRI ( Gilbert et al, 2018 ), and in magnetoencephalographic resting state recordings ( Antonakakis et al, 2019 ). In all of those examples, the differences in mTBI tended to be in frontal or parietal nodes and are likely specific to certain frequency band oscillations (beta frequency in Antonakakis et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That the temporal dynamics of brain network activity differs in the individuals with TBI is a fairly recent discovery, reported in resting state fMRI ( Vergara et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Hou et al, 2019 ; Lu et al, 2021 ), in task-related fMRI ( Gilbert et al, 2018 ), and in magnetoencephalographic resting state recordings ( Antonakakis et al, 2019 ). In all of those examples, the differences in mTBI tended to be in frontal or parietal nodes and are likely specific to certain frequency band oscillations (beta frequency in Antonakakis et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The group differences in the timing of peak connectivity, particularly of the FP, corresponding to peak effort level or longer TOT, suggest that the mTBI group has hyper-connectivity of the CO, or hypo-connectivity of the FP network, either of which is different from that seen in the control group. That the temporal dynamics of brain network activity differs in the individuals with TBI is a fairly recent discovery, reported in resting state fMRI (Vergara et al, 2017(Vergara et al, , 2018Hou et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2021), in task-related fMRI (Gilbert et al, 2018), and in magnetoencephalographic resting state recordings (Antonakakis et al, 2019). In all of those examples, the differences in mTBI tended to be in frontal or parietal nodes and are likely specific to certain frequency band oscillations (beta frequency in Antonakakis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Task Modulation Of Network Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have provided extensive evidence for impaired brain structure and functional connectivity (FC) in patients with mTBI and TBI (8,9). FC abnormalities have commonly been detected in regions within the attention, default mode, executive, salience, and somatosensory networks in the different timing of data acquisition after mTBI (10)(11)(12). Different brain regions and networks have their own tasks and functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, previous studies used a graph theoretical approach to investigate alterations in brain network topology based on resting-state functional connectivity in patents with mTBI (Hou et al, 2019;Boroda et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2021). Moreover, several studies suggested that dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) can be used to identify optimal dFNC states for the classification of mTBI, which has shown potential as an important imaging modality for the development of mTBI biomarkers (Vergara et al, 2018;Li et al, 2021;Lu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%