2002
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2002.1011194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of adaptive filters to track carrier offsets and channel nonstationarities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, based on the energy conservation relation, the tracking performance of the APA to the carrier frequency offset (CFO) is analyzed. This result is compared with the tracking performance of NLMS in [4][5] and the performance of the APA without CFO in [7]. Simulation results show that the analysis and the derived performance expressions are close to the simulation curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Then, based on the energy conservation relation, the tracking performance of the APA to the carrier frequency offset (CFO) is analyzed. This result is compared with the tracking performance of NLMS in [4][5] and the performance of the APA without CFO in [7]. Simulation results show that the analysis and the derived performance expressions are close to the simulation curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The variations of the system or channel can be classified as random system nonstationarities and cyclic system nonstationarities [2]. For the last decades, the ability of adaptive filters to track random system nonstationarities has received considerable attention [3] [4][5] [6]. The cyclic system nonstationarities, which is generated by the mismatches between the transmitter and receiver carrier generators, degrade the performance of adaptive filters seriously, even for ever small carrier frequency offsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, this results in a lower symbol error rate in fast fading wireless channels. Note that the LMS algorithm alone has a limited tracking performance [3], and the step-size parameter cannot be chosen unboundedly large in order to track fast channel variations, since it will make the filter unstable. For such a scenario, the phaseerror term enhances the phase tracking performance of the filter (and, consequently, the symbol-error-rate), without sacrificing the stability of the filter.…”
Section: A Geometric Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%