2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability tilt on the SAT and ACT predicts specific abilities and college majors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also extend prior SAT research for STEM and the humanities outcomes (Achter et al, 1999;Coyle et al, 2014;Lubinski et al, 2001). Whereas prior research has predicted college preferences (e.g., courses and majors) and later achievements (e.g., patents and novels), the current study was the first to predict course specific GPAs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results also extend prior SAT research for STEM and the humanities outcomes (Achter et al, 1999;Coyle et al, 2014;Lubinski et al, 2001). Whereas prior research has predicted college preferences (e.g., courses and majors) and later achievements (e.g., patents and novels), the current study was the first to predict course specific GPAs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Additional GPAs were available for engineering (GPAengr) and computer science (GPAcs), which were combined with GPAm and GPAsci to form a STEM factor; and for art/music (GPAart), foreign languages (GPAfl), history (GPAhis), and humanities (GPAhum), which were combined with GPAv to form a humanities factor. The distinction between STEM and humanities has been validated in SAT research (Achter et al, 1999;Coyle et al, 2014;Lubinski et al, 2001). High SAT math scores predict STEM achievements, and high SAT verbal scores predict humanities achievements.…”
Section: Sat Scores and Gpasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research findings indicate this intraindividual variation has important practical implications. For instance, individuals with stronger verbal than visuospatial skills tend to pursue degrees, careers, and creative achievements in the arts and humanities, whereas those with stronger visuospatial than verbal skills focus their energies in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM; Coyle & Pillow, 2008;Coyle, Purcell, Snyder, & Richmond, 2014;Kell, Lubinski, Benbow, & Steiger, 2013;Wai, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2009).…”
Section: Traditional Human Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%