2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2811010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability Tracking and Social Capital in China's Rural Secondary School System

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to Western contexts, where admission to higher education is multidimensional, the test score in the standardized entry examination (gaokao) is the most salient factor. Besides test-centeredness being a central characteristic of the Chinese educational system (Hannum et al 2019), grades are important for withinschool ability tracking, signals of future success in standardized examinations, and Chinese culture places a high social value on them (Li et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to Western contexts, where admission to higher education is multidimensional, the test score in the standardized entry examination (gaokao) is the most salient factor. Besides test-centeredness being a central characteristic of the Chinese educational system (Hannum et al 2019), grades are important for withinschool ability tracking, signals of future success in standardized examinations, and Chinese culture places a high social value on them (Li et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was conducted immediately prior to the implementation of the study during the 2012–2013 school year in one prefecture in Gansu Province and one prefecture in Shaanxi Province. By choosing two provinces that differ in terms of wealth and development, as measured by GDP per capita (Gansu is relatively poor, and Shaanxi is close to China’s overall average), we are able to increase the generalizability of our findings [23]. Gansu’s GDP per capita, 3919 USD, was ranked the second poorest among China’s 31 provincial administrative regions in 2013.…”
Section: Sampling Data Collection and Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%