2020
DOI: 10.2989/16085914.2019.1680340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abiotic and biotic responses to the 2016/2017 restoration project at the St Lucia Estuary mouth, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Restoration would enhance the provision of estuarine ecosystem services that are estimated to contribute R 4.2 billion to the national economy annually [36]. Most estuary restoration interventions have addressed hydrological or hydrodynamic issues such as the reconnection of the iMfolozi/uMsunduze and St. Lucia estuaries [37] and the active management of the Zandvlei Estuary mouth to maintain water quality [38]. Some physical habitat restoration has been carried out at the Knysna and Keurbooms estuaries by deploying artificial structures to prevent bank erosion, which, in turn, provides alternative habitats for estuarine fauna [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration would enhance the provision of estuarine ecosystem services that are estimated to contribute R 4.2 billion to the national economy annually [36]. Most estuary restoration interventions have addressed hydrological or hydrodynamic issues such as the reconnection of the iMfolozi/uMsunduze and St. Lucia estuaries [37] and the active management of the Zandvlei Estuary mouth to maintain water quality [38]. Some physical habitat restoration has been carried out at the Knysna and Keurbooms estuaries by deploying artificial structures to prevent bank erosion, which, in turn, provides alternative habitats for estuarine fauna [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1960s, a back channel was dredged from the Mfolozi River through the mangroves of the St Lucia Narrows to allow for the reconnection of the two systems (Whitfield and Taylor, 2009;Taylor 2013). A link channel was later created in the early 1980s (Jones et al 2020) to combat the drought conditions within the St Lucia Estuary. Due to severe drought conditions from 2002 until 2007/08, the iSimangaliso Wetland Park authority attempted to reopen and widen the back channel again to allow for a brief relinkage of the two systems (Whitfield and Taylor, 2009;Taylor and Adams, 2013;Cyrus et al 2020;Schutte et al 2020).…”
Section: Tarebia Granifera: a Prominent Threat In South African Aquat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, a new channel called the Mfolozi spillway or beach channel was dredged, allowing for freshwater input from the Mfolozi River (Cyrus et al 2020). In late 2015/early 2016, the St Lucia Estuary had become highly fragmented due to low water levels and decreased rainfall (Jones et al 2020). However, in June 2016, the iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority initiated a Global Environment Facility (GEF) restoration project (Jones et al 2020).…”
Section: Tarebia Granifera: a Prominent Threat In South African Aquat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations