2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abiotic anoxic reduction of AsO4 adsorbed Mg(II)–Al(III)/Fe(III)–CO3/SO4 Layered Double Hydroxides: Implications of As release and phase transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our data (Fig. 1 and TableS5), we could observe that changes to the basal and interlayer spacings were < 0.1 Å and as such indicated surface adsorbed and not interlayer incorporation, in agreement with our previous work(Lu et al, 2020). A slightly higher background is noted here after the adsorption for the PXRD but is similar to what is observed for SeO 4 and MoO 4 adsorbed MgFeSO 4 HTLC by Paikaray et al…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Based on our data (Fig. 1 and TableS5), we could observe that changes to the basal and interlayer spacings were < 0.1 Å and as such indicated surface adsorbed and not interlayer incorporation, in agreement with our previous work(Lu et al, 2020). A slightly higher background is noted here after the adsorption for the PXRD but is similar to what is observed for SeO 4 and MoO 4 adsorbed MgFeSO 4 HTLC by Paikaray et al…”
supporting
confidence: 92%