2014
DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abiotic-biotic characterization of Pt/Ir microelectrode arrays in chronic implants

Abstract: Pt/Ir electrodes have been extensively used in neurophysiology research in recent years as they provide a more inert recording surface as compared to tungsten or stainless steel. While floating microelectrode arrays (FMA) consisting of Pt/Ir electrodes are an option for neuroprosthetic applications, long-term in vivo functional performance characterization of these FMAs is lacking. In this study, we have performed comprehensive abiotic-biotic characterization of Pt/Ir arrays in 12 rats with implant periods ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
195
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
8
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This loss of viable neurons at the electrode-tissue interface may contribute to signal deterioration and the eventual failure of penetrating electrodes. Therefore, to improve the long-term reliability of neural probe over time, the next generation of high-performance microelectrodes must cause a lower tissue reactivity, BBB disruption, glial response and neuronal degeneration/damage [27, 35, 37]. It is also critical to consider electrode design factors including size, shape and tethering [35, 38, 39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss of viable neurons at the electrode-tissue interface may contribute to signal deterioration and the eventual failure of penetrating electrodes. Therefore, to improve the long-term reliability of neural probe over time, the next generation of high-performance microelectrodes must cause a lower tissue reactivity, BBB disruption, glial response and neuronal degeneration/damage [27, 35, 37]. It is also critical to consider electrode design factors including size, shape and tethering [35, 38, 39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, following implantation of intracortical microelectrodes, multiple failure modes can occur, ultimately resulting in loss of recorded signals weeks to months after surgery (Prasad et al, 2012; Barrese et al, 2013; Prasad et al, 2014). One emerging hypothesis concerning microelectrode failure suggests a leading role for oxidative stress in altering neuronal cell viability and blood brain barrier stability at the device-tissue interface (McConnell et al, 2009; Potter et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One emerging hypothesis concerning microelectrode failure suggests a leading role for oxidative stress in altering neuronal cell viability and blood brain barrier stability at the device-tissue interface (McConnell et al, 2009; Potter et al, 2013). In addition, it has also been proposed that the same oxidative environment can result in breakdown/corrosion of both the insulator and the metals of the electrode itself (Schmitt et al, 1999; Barrese et al, 2013; Kozai et al, 2014; Prasad et al, 2014; Sankar et al, 2014). Therefore, given this possible role for oxidative stress events, the biological mechanisms that might create and propagate a local oxidative environment around implanted microelectrodes are being investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impedance of the electrode depends on the surface area that comes into contact with the biological tissue, but for the typical 12.5-200µm diameter the impedance of Pt/Ir electrodes are in the 0.1-5MΩ range (Prasad, 2014) and tungsten electrodes in the 30-400kΩ range (Prasad and Sanchez, 2012).…”
Section: Materials Considerations In Human Unit Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%