2016
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abiotic Characterization of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta f. fario) and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Spawning Redds Affected by Small Hydropower Plants - Case Studies from Austria

Abstract: Salmonid rivers in Austria are considerably regulated by small hydropower facilities, resulting in potential declines of the spawning habitats of salmonids. To assess the restrictions and possible quality of hydropower‐influenced river sections for salmonid, spawning redd densities of brown trout and rainbow trout were monitored in two rivers in 2014 and 2015. The results showed spawning close to small hydropower facilities for both investigated species — with similarities in redd characteristics like pit and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3) and disturbance in their age structure or complete disappearance of brown trout in sections along diversions (Appendix 1). This agrees with findings of Obruca and Hauer (2016), who studied the effects of RRHPs on trout in Austria. Consistency between changes in T A B L E 3 Stream samples in sections upstream of water intake facilities (Sample 1) and along diversions (Sample 2); E i is ecological index fish community structures and changes of their character (E i ) from the upper to middle rithron type in particular streams (Table 3) confirms the influence of RRHPs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Table 3) and disturbance in their age structure or complete disappearance of brown trout in sections along diversions (Appendix 1). This agrees with findings of Obruca and Hauer (2016), who studied the effects of RRHPs on trout in Austria. Consistency between changes in T A B L E 3 Stream samples in sections upstream of water intake facilities (Sample 1) and along diversions (Sample 2); E i is ecological index fish community structures and changes of their character (E i ) from the upper to middle rithron type in particular streams (Table 3) confirms the influence of RRHPs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(e) Therefore, dams and reservoirs change local taxonomic structure and composition depending on their size and operations, including the increased prevalence of non‐native invasive species (Hughes, Rinne, & Calamusso, ; Johnson, Olden, & Vander Zanden, ; Linares, Callisto, & Marques, ; Terra & Araujo, ; White, ). Importantly, studies on these ecological impacts are mainly based on large dams (e.g., Agostinho, Pelicice, & Gomes, ; Horsák, Bojková, Zahrádková, Omesová, & Helešic, ; Martins et al, ), whereas information about the ecological consequences of small hydropower dams is largely lacking (e.g., Anderson, Moggridge, Shucksmith, & Warren, ; Mbaka & Wanjiru Mwaniki, ; Obruca & Hauer, ; Wang, Chen, Liu, & Zhu, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occasionally low bankfull discharge capacity of these rivers hardly enables the breakup of the surface layer due to the low bed shear stresses, even in terms of exceptional flood events (e.g., with hundred‐year recurrence intervals; Hauer, Unfer, Tritthart, & Habersack, ). Furthermore, suitable spawning gravel ( d = 2–5 cm; Obruca & Hauer, ) deposited in the subsurface layer is limited and largely unavailable for the reproduction of salmonids ( Salmo trutta and Thymallus thymallus ; Hauer et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%