2006
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/23.1.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abiotic Factors Influencing Deer Browsing in West Virginia

Abstract: We present a comparison of woody browse availability and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) use among clearcut interiors, skidder trail edges, and mature forest and an evaluation of the relative importance of aboitic factors in predicting browsing pressure within regenerating clearcuts in the central Appalachians of West Virginia. We sampled 810 1-m2 plots in or adjacent to nine regenerating clearcuts (8–19 ha) during the summer of 2001. Availability and use of woody browse did not differ between clear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
49
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental variables elevation and crown closure were of similar importance as forage characteristics. Elevation was an important predictor of browsing in previous studies (Campbell et al, 2006;Vospernik & Reimoser, 2008), and might in this study be a proxy for hidden variables that were not measured, such as forest stand density and cover, remoteness, or forest continuity. Low crown closure, that is, a more open stand, leaves more light to the tree saplings and can increase nutrient availability (Ritter & Vesterdal, 2006).…”
Section: Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The environmental variables elevation and crown closure were of similar importance as forage characteristics. Elevation was an important predictor of browsing in previous studies (Campbell et al, 2006;Vospernik & Reimoser, 2008), and might in this study be a proxy for hidden variables that were not measured, such as forest stand density and cover, remoteness, or forest continuity. Low crown closure, that is, a more open stand, leaves more light to the tree saplings and can increase nutrient availability (Ritter & Vesterdal, 2006).…”
Section: Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 73%
“…When working with observational data, other factors influencing deer browsing need to be taken into account, such as forest site characteristics, including the light regime (Gill & Beardall, 2001), and potential disturbance of the feeding animals by, for example, hiking trails (Möst, Hothorn, Müller, & Heurich, 2015). Other studies also included topographic information (elevation, slope, aspect) (Campbell, Laseter, Ford, Odom, & Miller, 2006;Vospernik & Reimoser, 2008). Hence, in our study, we control for these forest stand and environmental parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…West Virginia is south of the natural range of the Eastern spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) (Kucera & Orr 2006; Karen Kish, West Virginia Department of Agriculture, personal communication, 2006), a serious pest of red spruce. White‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) herbivory, a significant problem for many woody species in this portion of the central Appalachians (Campbell et al 2006), has much less impact on red spruce. Typically, red spruce is a less preferred browse than balsam fir, eastern hemlock, or almost all the hardwood species occurring in region (Telfer 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, high white‐tailed deer populations, released by elimination of their natural predators, have heavily browsed on preferred tree seedling species (e.g. sugar maple, red oak) (Marquis 1981; Tilghman 1989; Kittredge & Ashton 1995; Fortney & Rentch 2003; Reyes & Vasseur 2003; Pedersen & Wallis 2004; Rossell et al 2005; Campbell et al 2006; Holladay et al 2006) and can also impact the regeneration of less preferred species such as red spruce (Reyes & Vasseur 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%