Abiotic Stress Responses in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Mechanisms and Adaptations

Kalarani, M. K.; Senthil, A.; Punitha, S.; Sowmyapriya, S.; Umapathi, Mangajji R.; Geethalakshmi, V.

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5817-5_11

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Groundnut-Canola System

Ahmed,

Ahmad,

Abbas

et al. 2024

Cropping Systems Modeling Under Changing Climate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Groundnut-Canola System

Ahmed,

Ahmad,

Abbas

et al. 2024

Cropping Systems Modeling Under Changing Climate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identification, Characterization and Expression of Two Transcription Factors MYB44 and WRKY22 from Drought Tolerant Peanut Cultivar L14

Tien,

Kha,

Loc

2024

Appl Biochem Microbiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of Cold Resistance at Seedling Stage for 70 Peanut Genotypes Based on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics

Ye,

Wang,

et al. 2024

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low-temperature stress is one of the factors affecting the growth and development of peanuts. Currently, biochemical detection technologies for crop freeze damage are well established. In the context of rapid development in optical sensing technology and smart agriculture, non-destructive crop freeze damage detection based on such technologies has gained increasing attention. The accurate detection, early warning, and targeted control of crop cold damage are particularly important. In this study, 70 peanut germplasm resources were collected and used for the research objectives. Indoor low-temperature seedling identification was conducted at 25 °C (the control group) and 5 °C (low-temperature stress group) for 7 days. Photosynthetic fluorescence values in leaves, as well as 13 indicators (Fo, Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm, Fv’/Fm’, ΦPSII, NPQ, qP, Rfd, Pn, Gs, Ci, and Tr), were analyzed for their responses to low-temperature stress. The results showed that under low-temperature stress, the Pn and Ci of peanut seedlings exhibited an ascending trend, while Tr and other indicators showed a decreasing trend compared to the control group. Based on the relative coefficients of resistance to low temperature for each individual indicator, a comprehensive non-destructive evaluation of cold resistance was conducted using methods such as principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and stepwise regression. Through principal component analysis, the 13 individual physiological indicators were transformed into 3 comprehensive indicators. The 70 peanut varieties were divided into 4 categories based on their resistance to low temperature: sensitive materials, moderately sensitive materials, moderately cold-tolerant materials, and cold-tolerant materials. Additionally, a mathematical model for evaluating cold resistance in peanuts was established.

show abstract

Abiotic Stress Responses in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Mechanisms and Adaptations

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Groundnut-Canola System

Groundnut-Canola System

Identification, Characterization and Expression of Two Transcription Factors MYB44 and WRKY22 from Drought Tolerant Peanut Cultivar L14

Evaluation of Cold Resistance at Seedling Stage for 70 Peanut Genotypes Based on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About