Ablation Index Guided Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation

Makihara, Yu; Miyazaki, Shinsuke; Harama, Tomoko; Obunai, Kotaro; Watanabe, Hiroyuki; Tada, Hiroshi

doi:10.1536/ihj.22-091

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ILD < 4 mm combined with AI value of 450 resulted in 74% first-pass posterior wall isolation. However, first-pass roof line block was achieved in 80% of cases and the first-pass bottom line block in 83% [16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

The Impact of Regional Maximum Tolerated Interlesion Distance on the Long-Term Ablation Outcomes in Ablation Index Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

Kiedrowicz

Wielusiński

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An adequate interlesion distance (ILD) applied during point-by-point pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has never been established. We hypothesized that maximum tolerated ILD may differ between PV regions and may influence long-term ablation outcomes. Methods: A total of 260 AF patients underwent PV isolation with 3D electroanatomical platform. Postablation, ILD values were classified into 5 groups (6–5.5 mm, 5.5–5.0 mm, 5.0–4.5 mm, 4.5–4.0 mm and <4.0 mm); the number of tags in each group was calculated and correlated with postablation AF recurrence (AFR). All measurements were performed globally for the entire encirclement around each individual PV and regionally for designated PV anatomic segments. Results: Single-procedure freedom from AF was 81% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF at 12 months. Global analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD nor the number of lesions within each ILD tag group for any PV. Segmental analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD. However, the presence of tags from the 5.5–6.0 mm ILD group located on the posterior aspect of right upper PV (RUPV) correlated with AFR. This was confirmed in a multivariable logistic regression model. Conclusions: Maximum tolerated ILD of 6.0 mm translated into well-accepted ablation results. However, the study suggests that it may be inadequate at the posterior aspect of RUPV.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%