2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10894-013-9639-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation of Fusion Materials Exposed to High Heat Flux in an Electrothermal Plasma Discharge as a Simulation for Hard Disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain the bulk flow parameters at the source exit, the stand-alone electrothermal plasma solver ETFLOW [4][5][6] has been used for the peak discharge current I = 50 kA for Lexan polycarbonate (C 16 H 14 O 3 ) [3] as the ablative capillary sleeve material for five different capillary radii, r c = 0.002, 0.00225, 0.0025, 0.00275 and 0.003 m. Ablated mass (M abl ), plasma bulk density (q), plasma pressure (P), bulk temperature (T bulk ) and plasma bulk velocity (V bulk ) at the capillary exit for the respective cases have been obtained and the Mach numbers have been calculated for the subsonic flow at the capillary exit from the obtained source exit data. Table 1 presents the relevant capillary exit data of interest, that enable us to establish scaling laws between the source radius ratio R c and the above mentioned plasma bulk parameters.…”
Section: Assessment Of Effect Of Source Capillary Radius Using Etflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to obtain the bulk flow parameters at the source exit, the stand-alone electrothermal plasma solver ETFLOW [4][5][6] has been used for the peak discharge current I = 50 kA for Lexan polycarbonate (C 16 H 14 O 3 ) [3] as the ablative capillary sleeve material for five different capillary radii, r c = 0.002, 0.00225, 0.0025, 0.00275 and 0.003 m. Ablated mass (M abl ), plasma bulk density (q), plasma pressure (P), bulk temperature (T bulk ) and plasma bulk velocity (V bulk ) at the capillary exit for the respective cases have been obtained and the Mach numbers have been calculated for the subsonic flow at the capillary exit from the obtained source exit data. Table 1 presents the relevant capillary exit data of interest, that enable us to establish scaling laws between the source radius ratio R c and the above mentioned plasma bulk parameters.…”
Section: Assessment Of Effect Of Source Capillary Radius Using Etflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruption events expected in real-life tokamaks can deposit localized transient heat fluxes in the range of 50-60 GW/m 2 , at times even reaching a transient peak value of 80-100 GW/m 2 over a short period of time ranging from a few hundred microseconds to tens of milliseconds, resulting in evaporation of interior critical components, especially the divertor, and causing the resultant dust particulates to spread into the reactor vacuum vessel [1,3,6]. One of the recently published previous works [1] investigated high current, temperature, exit velocity and high-pressure pulsed electrothermal plasma source (PEPS) as a simulator for the source term that represents the erosion of the surfaces of various plasma facing components (PFC) and generation of aerosol particulates under a hard disruption-like condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beryllium has the advantage of being a low-Z material so low risk of plasma contamination, non-reactive with hydrogenic isotopes and has good thermal conductivity [3,4] , however, its dust is toxic when ablating and expanding into the vacuum vessel of the reactor. Echols and Winfrey conducted computational work using the electrothermal plasma code ETFLOW in the ideal plasma regime for capillary discharge to simulate high heat flux deposition on materials and their ablative behavior [5] . They compared performance of beryllium and lithium at heat fluxes between 10 and 125 GW/m 2 with capillary discharge currents between 9.5 to 76 kA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared performance of beryllium and lithium at heat fluxes between 10 and 125 GW/m 2 with capillary discharge currents between 9.5 to 76 kA. They reported the highest ablation for beryllium as compared to lithium [5] . The present study compares beryllium and lithium in the nonideal plasma regime for heat fluxes between 57 and 288 GW/m 2 with capillary discharge currents between 50 to 250 kA over a 120 μs pulse length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PFMs are still subjected to the high-energy transient heat load because of the instability of plasma, such as vertical displacement events (VDEs, ~ 60 MJ m −2 , ~ 300 ms) and edge-localized modes (ELMs, ~ 1 MJ m −2 , < 0.5 ms) [12,13]. Such a high-energy density can lead to recrystallization (for deformed W materials), surface melting, ablation, cracking, and other serious irreversible damages for PFMs [14], resulting in reducing its basic physical properties and shortening its service life [15,16]. The particle irradiation from the plasma also causes some damages for PFMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%