SUMMARY The long-term follow-up of six patients operated on for aorto-left ventricular communication has been reviewed in detail. All had residual aortic regurgitation after the initial repair of the defect. It was severe in four and required repeated reoperation in three with ultimate aortic valve replacement.The failure of early repair to solve the haemodynamic problem has provoked a reconsideration of the basic anatomy, of the surgical approach, and of the postoperative physiology of this anomaly.The so called "tunnel" is not a tunnel with length but should be considered as a localised breach at the insertion of the right coronary cusp. The localised aortic root dilatation at the site is a weakness that remains after closure of the tunnel leaving a poorly supported aortic valve and a weak root. Thus, the initial repair of the aorto-left ventricular communication must not only close the communication but reinforce, strengthen, and support the right aortic sinus in order to maintain cusp competence.A congenital aorto-left ventricular communication, known as a "tunnel"'I presents as severe aortic regurgitation in the neonate, infant, and child.2 Theoretically, closure of the communication should solve the haemodynamic problem, but reports show that severe aortic regurgitation may persist.3-6 Unfortunately, later aortic valve repair has failed in our hands so that ultimately aortic valve replacement has been necessary in some cases.It was hoped that early closure of the defect would prevent secondary effects on the aortic root and cusps,4 6-8 but our recent experience suggests that this is not so.This has prompted us to review the late results of previously reported patients, add new experience, and reconsider the anatomy of this congenital defect.