2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal cutaneomotor integration in patients with cerebellar syndromes: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibition was found in healthy volunteers at ISI 18 ms but was absent in patients with Parkinson's disease (Delwaide and Olivier 1990). Inhibition of the TMS response by a preceding digital nerve stimulus was repeatedly reported at ISI 20 ms (Tamburin et al 2001;Tamburin et al 2002;Tamburin et al 2003). On the other hand, in another study, the minimum ISI at which a digital nerve stimulus could suppress MEPs evoked by TMS was found to be 22 ms (Tokimura et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Inhibition was found in healthy volunteers at ISI 18 ms but was absent in patients with Parkinson's disease (Delwaide and Olivier 1990). Inhibition of the TMS response by a preceding digital nerve stimulus was repeatedly reported at ISI 20 ms (Tamburin et al 2001;Tamburin et al 2002;Tamburin et al 2003). On the other hand, in another study, the minimum ISI at which a digital nerve stimulus could suppress MEPs evoked by TMS was found to be 22 ms (Tokimura et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to intrinsic mechanisms, the level of cortical excitability depends in part on the activity of subcortical structures such as basal ganglia and cerebellum. Tamburin et al [53] have recently reported that inhibition of MEPs to TMS stimulation by cutaneous afferences is reduced in patients with pure cerebellar syndromes. The authors argued that this alteration could be related to an impairment of cerebellar tonic or phasic modulation of motor cortex excitability.Abnormal cerebellar inputs to sensorimotor cortex have been postulated to play a role in the origin of cortical reflex myoclonus in patients with cerebellar damage, including patients with MSAc [39,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral afferents could be first processed at the spinal cord where they can change the excitability of spinal interneurons [10]. Further rostral integrative centers are found in the cerebellum [22,53], in the basal ganglia [1,43], and in the bulbopontine reticular formation, where afferent inputs may modulate the subcortical motor commands [46]. Specific brainstem nuclei with sensorimotor integration capacities are the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTn) and the superior colliculus (SC), which in turn modify the excitability of the neurons of the spinal trigeminal nucleus [2,3,20].When afferent inputs reach the motor cortex, they can also modulate cortical neuronal excitability [24,56] and, by way of the corticostriatal loop, modify the output of the GABAergic interneurons of the striatum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations