1982
DOI: 10.1126/science.7100921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Development of Kitten Retino-Geniculate Connectivity in the Absence of Action Potentials

Abstract: Action potentials were silenced in one eye of neonatal kittens by repeated intraocular injections of tetrodotoxin for 5 to 8 weeks. After tetrodotoxin blockade was allowed to wear off, receptive field properties of individual relay cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus were examined. The many ON-OFF and binocular fields found in the layers that receive input from the treated eye suggest that these cells had extremely abnormal retino-geniculate synaptic connections. These effects were different in kind from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A role for neuronal activity in the development of the topographic projection in the retinotectal system had been proposed previously (Archer et al, 1982;O'Leary et al, 1986;Sretavan et al, 1988;Cook et al, 1999). However, results from experiments in which TTX was used to block neuronal activity in the visual system of developing zebrafish suggested no significant role for neuronal activity in the mapping process (Stuermer et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A role for neuronal activity in the development of the topographic projection in the retinotectal system had been proposed previously (Archer et al, 1982;O'Leary et al, 1986;Sretavan et al, 1988;Cook et al, 1999). However, results from experiments in which TTX was used to block neuronal activity in the visual system of developing zebrafish suggested no significant role for neuronal activity in the mapping process (Stuermer et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Thus, the CNS provides an appropriate environment within which specific connections can be made. Several mechanisms have been hypothesized to account for specificity of fiber growth as well as connectivity, such as neuronal activity (Archer et al, 1982;Dubin et al, 1986;Shatz and Stryker, 1988;Sretavan et al, 1988), cell surface molecules (Weiss, 1947;Edelman, 1984a,b), growth or chemotactic factors (Ramon y Cajal, 19 10, 1959;Levi-Montalcini, 1964), electrical fields (Jaffe and Nuccitelli, 1977;Robinson, 1985;Faber and Korn, 1989), and adjacent fibers (Lynch et al, 1972(Lynch et al, , 1976Rutishauser et al, 1978), among others. Through these postulated mechanisms, the brain regulates the development of correctly functioning circuits, which are essential for normal brain organization and function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1987;Constantine-Paton et al 1990). Both types of neuronal plasticity are activity-dependent (Archer et al 1982;Constantine-Paton et al 1990;Bliss and Collingridge 1993); both are thought to require Hebbian association of pre-and postsynaptic activity (Malinow and Miller 1986;Collingridge and Bliss 1987;Gustafsson et al 1987;Fregnac et al 1988;Greuel et al 1988) and the activation of N-methyl-n-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (Cline et al 1987;Collingridge and Bliss 1987). Recently, LTP was linked to critical period plasticity in the primary somatosensory cortex (Crair and Malenka 1995) and the primary visual cortex (Kirkwood et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%