2016
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23307
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal functional connectivity and cortical integrity influence dominant hand motor disability in multiple sclerosis: a multimodal analysis

Abstract: Functional reorganization and structural damage occur in the brains of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) throughout the disease course. However, the relationship between resting-state functional connectivity (FC) reorganization in the sensorimotor network and motor disability in MS is not well understood. This study used resting-state fMRI, T1-weighted and T2-weighted, and magnetization transfer (MT) imaging to investigate the relationship between abnormal FC in the sensorimotor network and upper limb motor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to two possibilities: either (a) increases in FC have no association to task performance or (b) the “adaptiveness” of FC increases might depend on where in the brain they occur and which functional domains are classically associated with that region. While FC increases within domain-specific brain regions might improve the patient's ability to perform the task at hand [e.g., cognitively preserved patients had higher FC between the DMN-hubs, MPFC, and PCC compared to cognitively impaired patients, see ( 109 ); and patients with preserved manual function had higher FC from sensorimotor regions to the rest of the brain, see ( 39 )], it might simultaneously hamper the performance in domain-unrelated tasks [e.g., patients with upper limb motor disability had increased FC between the DMN-regions, left pallidum, and ACC compared to patients without such disability, see ( 67 ); and patients with cognitive deficits had increased FC between sensorimotor regions and the thalamus, see ( 117 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This leads to two possibilities: either (a) increases in FC have no association to task performance or (b) the “adaptiveness” of FC increases might depend on where in the brain they occur and which functional domains are classically associated with that region. While FC increases within domain-specific brain regions might improve the patient's ability to perform the task at hand [e.g., cognitively preserved patients had higher FC between the DMN-hubs, MPFC, and PCC compared to cognitively impaired patients, see ( 109 ); and patients with preserved manual function had higher FC from sensorimotor regions to the rest of the brain, see ( 39 )], it might simultaneously hamper the performance in domain-unrelated tasks [e.g., patients with upper limb motor disability had increased FC between the DMN-regions, left pallidum, and ACC compared to patients without such disability, see ( 67 ); and patients with cognitive deficits had increased FC between sensorimotor regions and the thalamus, see ( 117 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise in the motor system, decreased connectivity between domain-specific areas leads to impairment of domain-specific behavior. Motor dysfunction in MS has been associated with reduced FC in important SMN-hubs, for example from the sensorimotor/somatosensory cortices ( 39 ) and the cerebellum ( 84 , 113 ) to the rest of the brain. Additionally, reduced motor performance co-occurred with reduced regional homogeneity in the cerebellum ( 98 ).…”
Section: Overview Of Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MS participants in whom motor skills were preserved displayed greater FC in structurally intact visual information processing regions than MS patients in whom motor skills were impaired. By contrast, motor-impaired MS participants displayed weaker FC in the sensorimotor and somatosensory association cortices and more severe structural damage throughout the brain [69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%