1992
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90407-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
326
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
20
326
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this mechanism, several studies have shown that neuro®bromin suppresses cell growth by inhibiting p21-ras activity in some cell types. These results are consistent with the notion that the tumor suppressor function of neurofibromin is related to its ability to operate as a GAP molecule (Basu et al, 1992;DeClue et al, 1992;Bollag et al, 1996;Largaespada et al, 1996). However, little is known about the function of neuro®bromin in astrocytes relevant to the development of astrocytomas in individuals a ected with NF1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In support of this mechanism, several studies have shown that neuro®bromin suppresses cell growth by inhibiting p21-ras activity in some cell types. These results are consistent with the notion that the tumor suppressor function of neurofibromin is related to its ability to operate as a GAP molecule (Basu et al, 1992;DeClue et al, 1992;Bollag et al, 1996;Largaespada et al, 1996). However, little is known about the function of neuro®bromin in astrocytes relevant to the development of astrocytomas in individuals a ected with NF1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition to being mutated in tumors, Ras and NF1 are able to interact and function in the same proliferative pathway, suggesting a possible cooperating e ect for the deregulation of these two proteins in tumorigenesis. Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation that NF1 is able to downregulate ras in vitro (Martin et al, 1990;Xu et al, 1990) and to inhibit ras-dependent proliferative and transforming e ects in tissue culture by mechanisms dependent (Basu et al, 1992;DeClue et al, 1992;Bollag et al, 1996;Largaespada et al, 1996) and independent Johnson et al, 1993) of the Ras GTPase accelerating activity of NF1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Neuro®brosarcoma cell lines that do not express or that underexpress NF1, show decrease Ras-GTPase accelerating activity and higher levels of Ras-GTP than tumor cells with normal NF1 levels (Basu et al, 1992;DeClue et al, 1992). Primary cultures of myeloid leukemia show also a reduction in the NF1-like GAP activity and elevated levels of Ras-GTP after serum starvation, or GM-CSF or serum stimulation (Bollag et al, 1996;Largaespada et al, 1996).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Nf1 Tumor Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis has been formally proven by analysing the consequences of inactivating the NF1 tumor suppressor, the gene responsible for the familial cancer syndrome neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) (Courtois-Cox et al, 2006). NF1 encodes a RasGAP protein, and its inactivation has been shown to cause an acute activation of (endogenous) Ras and Ras effector pathways (Basu et al, 1992;DeClue et al, 1992). Similar to MEFs expressing a single activated K-ras allele, inactivation of NF1 via shRNA constructs results in the immortalization of this cell type (Courtois-Cox et al, 2006).…”
Section: Does Signal Intensity or Cell Type Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%