2016
DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Returns from Takeover Prediction Modelling: Challenges and Suggested Investment Strategies

Abstract: There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. This is the peer-reviewed version of the following article: Danbolt, J., Siganos, A. and Tunyi, A. (2016) Abnormal returns from takeover prediction modelling: challenges and suggested investment strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
95
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(213 reference statements)
5
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assessment of a firm's vulnerability to future takeovers (i.e., takeover likelihood, henceforth TALI) is relevant for strategic management, as well as investment purposes (Palepu, 1986;Powell, 2001; Danbolt et al, 2016). Given the high abnormal returns that accrue to such firms (Franks and Harris, 1989;Danbolt, 2004), a potentially lucrative investment strategy can be developed around takeover target prediction (Powell, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An assessment of a firm's vulnerability to future takeovers (i.e., takeover likelihood, henceforth TALI) is relevant for strategic management, as well as investment purposes (Palepu, 1986;Powell, 2001; Danbolt et al, 2016). Given the high abnormal returns that accrue to such firms (Franks and Harris, 1989;Danbolt, 2004), a potentially lucrative investment strategy can be developed around takeover target prediction (Powell, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this study is motivated by the lack of consistent empirical support for one of the key hypotheses for takeover prediction-the firm size hypothesis. The hypothesis as put forward by Palepu (1986), and widely adopted across the takeover prediction literature (see, for example, Ambrose and Megginson, 1992;Powell, 1997Powell, , 2001Powell, , 2004Powell and Yawson, 2007;Gorton et al, 2009;Cremers et al, 2009;Danbolt et al, 2016;Tunyi and Ntim, 2016), argues that TALI is decreasing with target firm size (henceforth, SIZE) i.e., small (large) firms are more (less) vulnerable to takeover bids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sixth, future research should use the same period -Our review further shows that most of the studies on M&A activities focus on a relatively short period, with the exception of a few researchers who have extended their analysis above ten years. Hogholm (2016), Gan et al (2017) and Danbolt et al (2016) have extended their analysis for a period of 13, 20 and 23 years, respectively. Tuch and O"Sullivan (2007) described a short time as the days or months around the announcement of the bid, whilst long-time denotes as periods of month or years.…”
Section: New Directions For Future Research and Contributions To Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, finance researchers find that acquirers" abnormal returns ARs around merger announcement are either zero or negative and significant (Goddard et al, 2012;Braga & Gomes, 2016). In contrast, the ARs of targets are generally positive and significant (see, Danbolt et al, 2016;Gan et al, 2017). Jandik and Lallemand (2017) find that target issue more debt immediately before announcement results significant positive gain to target shareholders, but shareholders of bidder experience negative ARs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%