1993
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960161007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal signal‐averaged electrocardiogram in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy: Comparison of time and frequency domain analyses from the signal‐averaged electrocardiogram

Abstract: Summary:The clinical significance of an abnormal signal-averased electrocardiogram (SA-ECG) in time-and frequencydomain analyses was assessed in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Twenty-four DMD patients and 20 age-matched healthy volunteers were studied. The SA-ECG was recorded by timedomain signal processing using the vector-magnitude method and frequency-domain signal processing using the fast-Fourier transform. Abnormal SA-ECGs were based on comparison with controls and eight abnormal SAECGs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study group consisted of 29 children with muscular dystrophy (14 Duchenne muscular dystrophy, seven Becker muscular dystrophy, and eight female carriers) aged 1.5-17 years (mean, 8.1 ±4.34 years) and 29 healthy control subjects aged 3-14 years (mean, 8.3 ±3.01 years). All patients underwent M-mode and pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography and multigated radionuclide ventriculography for systolic and diastolic functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study group consisted of 29 children with muscular dystrophy (14 Duchenne muscular dystrophy, seven Becker muscular dystrophy, and eight female carriers) aged 1.5-17 years (mean, 8.1 ±4.34 years) and 29 healthy control subjects aged 3-14 years (mean, 8.3 ±3.01 years). All patients underwent M-mode and pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography and multigated radionuclide ventriculography for systolic and diastolic functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%