2015
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormalities of fixation, saccade and pursuit in posterior cortical atrophy

Abstract: Oculomotor function in the ‘visual dementia’ posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) has received little attention. Shakespeare et al. report impairments in fixation, saccade and smooth pursuit in patients with PCA and typical Alzheimer’s disease, and suggest that oculomotor impairment should be considered a core feature of the PCA syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, off-line manually coded saccade demonstrated significantly increased anticipatory saccade rates in the Alzheimer's disease group alone and in the horizontal gap condition alone, that was twice that found in aMCI and controls (33% versus 15%, p < 0.006). This outcome is consistent with a lack of inhibition of saccades in mild Alzheimer's disease that is sensitized by the gap paradigm [39,40]. Secondly, conventional post-hoc statistical analysis of manually coded error rates at antisaccades revealed that the mild Alzheimer's disease group had a reliably larger self-corrected error-rate than aMCI and controls, but self-correction was not significantly impaired in the aMCI group compared to controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, off-line manually coded saccade demonstrated significantly increased anticipatory saccade rates in the Alzheimer's disease group alone and in the horizontal gap condition alone, that was twice that found in aMCI and controls (33% versus 15%, p < 0.006). This outcome is consistent with a lack of inhibition of saccades in mild Alzheimer's disease that is sensitized by the gap paradigm [39,40]. Secondly, conventional post-hoc statistical analysis of manually coded error rates at antisaccades revealed that the mild Alzheimer's disease group had a reliably larger self-corrected error-rate than aMCI and controls, but self-correction was not significantly impaired in the aMCI group compared to controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A lower average gain was previously reported in mild Alzheimer's disease studies [8,10]. Lower gain/accuracy may be due to the degenerative process affecting parieto-occipital lobes and subcortical structures [39]. The mismatch between the latency distribution's intrinsic lognormal behavior, and Gaussian statistical assumptions underpinning conventional analyses likely yielded low statistical power, explaining the lack of significance found in the mild Alzheimer's disease group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Saccadic eye movement impairments are one of the most commonly documented forms of oculomotor dysfunction in AD patients, 1719 and have been recently reported in patients with the posterior cortical atrophy variant of AD. 20 Additional studies have also demonstrated that patients with amnestic MCI exhibit abnormal saccades. 21,22 These findings raise the possibility that a test of saccadic eye movement may have strong utility in the detection of cognitive impairment, in general, and AD, in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these data combined have yielded very important findings. AD is linked to thicker retinal inner plexiform layer (IPL) (Snyder et al, 2016), thinner retinal NFL (Danesh-Meyer et al, 2006; Iseri et al, 2006; Paquet et al, 2007; Kesler et al, 2011; Gao et al, 2015; Thomson et al, 2015), a reduced number in ganglion cell axons (Blanks et al, 1996b; Danesh-Meyer et al, 2006), narrowing of retinal veins with decreased blood flow (Berisha et al, 2007), higher number of astrocytes in the NFL (Blanks et al, 1996a, 1996b), Aβ accumulation in GCL, NFL, IPL, outer retina (Alexandrov et al, 2011; Koronyo-Hamaoui et al, 2011) and lens (Goldstein et al, 2003), reduced amplitude and increased implicit times in ganglion cell responses (Katz et al, 1989; Trick et al, 1989; Krasodomska et al, 2010; Moschos et al, 2012), increased levels of inflammatory marker complement factor H in the retina (Alexandrov et al, 2011), and abnormalities in eye fixation, saccadic and pursuit movements (Chang et al, 2014; Shakespeare et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%